This week’s stories unfolded like a scripted play: governments pretend to hold divisions while secretly building the infrastructure for the next crisis. Florida and its allies reject mandates in the name of freedom, while West Coast states form a “health alliance” to maintain “scientific integrity.” Meanwhile, rumors of vaccine-linked cancer begin to spread into mainstream discussions—softening the public for another wave of fear. Pandemics serve as both practice runs and staging grounds for future obedience.
Meanwhile, Trump accelerates the expansion of militarism. Renaming the Pentagon as the “Department of War” isn’t just symbolic—jets are preparing to strike at Venezuela, and rhetoric about regime change looms over the hemisphere. Finally, the AI state advances further, with Microsoft and Musk’s Grok AI integrating into federal infrastructure. A trifecta forms: health panic, military might, and algorithmic governance. The illusion of choice diminishes; only the machinery of control remains.
Pandemic Stagecraft and Health Alliances
Florida Surgeon General says state will eliminate vaccine mandates - NBC News
Florida vaccine mandates – CNN
RFK Jr. adviser Aseem Malhotra claims vaccine may have given cancer to royals - Daily Beast
Dr. Aseem Malhotra at Reform conference – The Guardian
Washington joins West Coast health alliance - The Olympian
West Coast health alliance press release – Governor WA
Bill Gates says Trump discussing gene-editing vaccines at the White House - Western Journal
Florida’s announcement that vaccine mandates will be eliminated may seem like defiance, but it’s also part of the show. Headlines portray rebellion against federal authority, yet this move establishes a controlled “choice architecture” that splits the population into red-state “freedom” groups and blue-state “scientific integrity” groups. The apparent battle lines are less about health and more about shaping narratives. The public faces a false choice—freedom vs. science—that conceals the real question: who gets to decide the terms of your body’s sovereignty?
Dr. Aseem Malhotra’s provocative claim that COVID-19 vaccines may have contributed to cancers in King Charles and Princess Kate is another carefully placed tremor. Whether or not the claim can be proven, its appearance in mainstream outlets signals a shift: the Overton Window is being pushed open. Vaccine harms, long dismissed as “conspiracy,” are now allowed as discussion—though not for justice, but for setting the stage. By leaking just enough scandal into public discourse, elites condition people for the inevitable emergence of a new medical emergency.
This reflects the prediction in COVID19: Short Path to “You’ll Own Nothing. And You’ll Be Happy.” that the next pandemic would likely occur around the end of 2025, probably a bird flu pandemic, and that it would exploit fear and division. The book warned that COVID wasn’t the final event but a rehearsal—a live-fire drill. Bird flu headlines have already appeared in the news throughout 2024–2025, which we have been monitoring to prepare the psychological ground. Now, health alliances and counter-alliances are shaping the “battle map.” The population is subtly led to believe this is a conflict between nations, when in fact, it’s collusion on both sides to keep everyone under control.
The West Coast’s “health alliance” branding itself as upholding “scientific integrity” should be seen more as a claim of authority than a genuine promise. Here, integrity means enforcing consensus science rather than supporting free inquiry. Just as the Patriot Act claimed to promote patriotism while restricting liberty, this alliance claims to uphold integrity while suppressing dissent. Language becomes a tool, turning virtue into mere obedience.
This landscape shifts with another signal: Bill Gates claiming that Trump is now openly talking about gene-editing vaccines at the White House. This isn’t a break but a continuation of their COVID-era relationship, where Gates’ foundations, pharmaceutical giants, and Trump’s Operation Warp Speed all worked closely together despite political posturing. The supposed populist outsider and the technocratic billionaire have always been dance partners in this show. Their renewed partnership on gene-editing vaccines indicates that the “battle lines” are only for public display. In truth, the same architects of COVID policy are preparing the sequel.
The stagecraft is clear: controlled opposition, manufactured tension, selective leaks, and rhetorical sleight of hand. The question is not if another pandemic will be declared—it is when. And the infrastructure—both rhetorical and bureaucratic—is already in place.
Trump’s Department of War and Venezuela Escalation
Trump renames Pentagon Department of War - The Guardian
Trump restores Department of War name - Gateway Pundit
Trump orders shoot-down of Venezuelan jets - Economic Times
Trump downplays regime change talk - Reuters
Venezuela strike and Rubio comments - AP News
The renaming of the Department of Defense to the “Department of War” removes the euphemism. For decades, it was “Defense,” hiding aggression under a defensive cover. Trump’s executive order makes the language honest: this is about war, not protection. Yet, the honesty itself is misleading—by rebranding with fanfare, the regime redefines open-ended militarism as bold patriotism. It is presented as a return to truth, but actually normalizes permanent aggression.
Deployments in the Caribbean and orders to shoot down Venezuelan jets confirm what the renaming symbolized: escalation is no longer hypothetical. Venezuela, portrayed as an eternal villain since Chávez, provides the pretext. Sanctions, rhetoric, and threats of regime change are nothing new—but now stealth fighters are airborne, and strikes are authorized. This marks the next frontier of empire: keep the hemisphere unstable, ensure resources are seized, and maintain the illusion of existential threats.
Here we observe tyranny in its most recognizable form: constantly expanding, never shrinking. In The Fallacious Belief in Government, this pattern was described as government growing through crises it itself creates or stokes. War is the simplest tool: enemies abroad justify increased control at home. Every bomb dropped in Caracas resonates in Washington as another plea for loyalty, obedience, and sacrifice.
Marco Rubio’s vocal support presents the move as a defense of democracy, but the reasoning is actually reversed. Democracy is just a facade; control is the real goal. Venezuelans’ sovereignty is dismissed, while Americans’ freedoms are sacrificed for a show of power. Tyranny spreads not by admitting it is tyranny, but by disguising itself as protection, honor, or necessity.
The irony is that renaming the Department of Defense as the Department of War admits the truth, but the public cheers the admission as strength. What should cause concern instead causes pride. It is a clever inversion: by confessing, the state consolidates its power. Tyranny, once named, is embraced.
Microsoft, Musk, and the AI State
Microsoft gives free Copilot AI to US government workers - Artificial Intelligence News
Musk’s Grok AI enters US government - OpenTools AI
Accelerating AI adoption for US government - Microsoft Blog
Free AI for government workers may sound like efficiency, but it is also a form of entrenchment. Microsoft and Musk are not philanthropists—they are empire-builders. By embedding Copilot and Grok directly into federal workflows, the private-public line is erased. Code becomes policy, and policy becomes code. Bureaucracy is digitized, surveilled, and automated. This is not adoption—it is annexation.
The rhetoric of “accelerating adoption” hides what is truly happening: dependency. Once agencies restructure their operations around proprietary AI, disentanglement becomes impossible. Decisions, workflows, and records will all be filtered through systems controlled by tech giants with opaque models. Government stops governing; it administers algorithms.
Tyranny doesn't need to wear jackboots when it can wear an interface. Chains can be made of data as easily as iron. And these chains are already being fastened—hidden under the friendly branding of “Copilot” and the futuristic allure of Musk’s Grok.
The merger of Microsoft and Musk isn't about competition but about consolidation. Two rival brands, one empire. The citizen isn't asked for permission; they're simply processed. Free AI acts as perfect bait: it reduces resistance while increasing dependence. The code remains invisible until it becomes unavoidable.
Ultimately, what we are witnessing is the formalization of governance itself. Law, war, and health crises—all managed and enforced by algorithms. The simulation isn't on its way; it's already here.
Crisis as Code
The three stories of the week are connected—part of the same symphony. Pandemic theater builds the emotional foundation, war expands the reach of power, and AI implements the control systems. Each one influences the next. Fear justifies violence, violence relies on code, and code reinforces fear.
The cycle is familiar: problem, reaction, solution. Yet language continues to evolve. “Integrity,” “defense,” “copilot”—all words that offer comfort but actually mask control. The tyranny is not just hypothetical; it's happening now. What remains to be seen is whether people recognize the stagecraft or keep applauding the performance.
Listen to this week's news in verse for a quick recap!
