• Agenda 21 in China and the Technocratic Vision for Global Dictatorship

    The Echo of Antony Sutton

    Source: Stateless Homesteading

    This is Antony Sutton:

    220px-Antonysutton

    Antony Sutton, circa 1984

    In the not-too-distant past, Sutton was counted among the more respected historians in higher education, holding the title of research fellow at the esteemed Hoover Institute at Stanford University. Before being jettisoned from this coveted position by the Trilateral-affiliated dean, Sutton was (and remains) one of the most thorough academic researchers on the machinations of the Anglo-American Establishment to date. His work was so well-documented that, despite being antagonistic towards Sutton's worldview, even Rhodesian globalist Zbignew Brzezinski cited the accuracy of his research in his book, Between Two Ages.

     

     

    Of the erudite body of work produced by Antony Sutton, he remains best known for his books on banking, industrial, corporate, and military aid to Nazi Germany and the USSR by American companies. The most widely read of these volumes, Wall Street and the Rise of Hitlerand Wall Street and the Bolshevik Revolution, hold that a secret cabal of Anglo-American forces have been integral in the creation and support of every "East vs. West" dialectic of the past century. Quite a thesis, with a slew of primary documentation and the pedigree to back it up.

     

    Needless to say, Sutton had to go.

     

    His removal from the hallowed and controlled halls of Academia didn't stop him, though, as he continued to publish research on Deep Politics related to the Trilateral Commission and Skull and Bones, among other things. Unfortunately, as seems to be a tendency among great researchers speaking truth to power, Sutton passed too early back in 2002, and since, his investigation into the international Anglophile cabal has remained largely unadvanced.

     

    Until recently, there was no "Great Eastern Superpower" to warrant such research, as the bulk of occulted geopolitical study was focused instead on the "War on Terror" paradigm; in a post-2008 world in which the media, both alternative and otherwise, have readily forecast rise of the BRICS "anti-hegemon," (as they're called by some) this has all changed.

     

    James Corbett of The Corbett Report has recently taken up the mantle of Antony Sutton, challenging the open source research community to investigate potential ties between the Anglo-American Establishment and the growth of China as a world power in the 21st Century. In an attempt to rise to the occasion, this article seeks to help with the heavy lifting, and as the title indicates, will investigate this narrative through the lens of Agenda 21 in China.

     

    What I've managed to find thus far is fascinating, if not somewhat expected.

     

    "It is not generally recognized by outsiders that almost all the information gathered by any espionage net is nonsecret material fully available to anyone as public information." -Carroll Quigley, Tragedy and Hope, pg. 920

     

    Trilaterals Over Tianjin

     

    Tianjin is no normal Chinese city. Billed as a joint partnership between China and Singapore, Tianjin is one of the United Nations' flagship "Eco-Cities." In fact, it's no normal "Eco-City," either; the UN has a particular affinity for Tianjin, going so far as to hold its annual Climate Change Convention there in 2010. It's a textbook "green engineered" Smart City as called for in the 1992 Rio Conference on Sustainable Development, colloquially known as Agenda 21, and despite China erecting these "Smart Cities" en-masse in recent years, Tianjin remains one the country's only successful "sustainable" ventures.Tianjin: The future slums of Eco-Fascism

    Tianjin: The future slums of Eco-Fascism

    To what does Tianjin owe this seemingly unnatural success? Look no further than one of Agenda 21's hallmarks, the public private partnership, for the answer; as one would expect, Tianjin has quite the sordid (and fiscally endowed) cast of private financiers behind its advancement. Investment in Tianjin's "green infrastructure" alone is slated at over $6.5 billion USD as of 2015. Taking a glance at their "Partners" page, three entities stand out as particularly noteworthy (circled in red):

     

    General Motors, Mitsui Fudosan, and Samsung

    General Motors, Mitsui Fudosan Residential, and Samsung

     

    What do these three corporations have in common and how are the tentacles of Globalism operating through them to erect Tianjin as China's leading Smart City? One helped build the Nazi Empire. Two are members of the globalist Trilateral Commission. Another is among the infamous zaibatsu,established in the wake of the Meiji Restoration as the West's mercantile dog in Asia. All have historical ties to the "apex of [Western] industry," otherwise known as the "power elite."

     

    We first turn our glance, as Antony Sutton once did, towards General Motors.

     

    From Sustainable Wars to Sustainable Development

     

    NaziGM

     

    Yes, this actually happened.

     

    GM, as outlined in Wall Street and the Rise of Hitler, is no stranger to promoting internationalism at the expense not only of American interests, but human life in general. Particularly egregious was the support for the Nazi war machine by General Motors, spanning from as early as 1928 into the waning days of World War II in 1945. "Support," perhaps, does not belie the true extent of GM's value to the Third Reich, as they were an integral component within the American cabal secretly supporting Germany. Opel, Germany's largest tank supplier, was a wholly-owned subsidiary of General Motors and a seminal example of the early Military Industrial Complex. 1936 marked a profitable turning point for the enterprising Nazis at GM, as the Reich granted them tax-exempt status in order to expand factories for the upcoming war effort. Not exactly the "Arsenal of Democracy" you heard about on the History Channel, is it?

     

    Opel Tanks - 'Like A Rock'

     

    Opel Tanks - 'Like A Rock'

     

    Not to be caught undiversified and solely in the business of making tanks, GM maintained close ties with Standard Oil of New Jersey in a joint effort to fuel the Nazi military. From providing the components for synthetic oils and rubbers to supplying ethyl lead for engine maintenance, Rockefeller's Standard Oil and GM, via the I.G. Farben cartel, delivered the means and methods of keeping the resource-strapped, war-torn Germany on steady footing much longer than could have otherwise been sustained. America makes bombs, Germany makes bombs, GM makes a killing. Sutton says of this incestuous "apex" of American industry:

     

    "In brief, American companies associated with the Morgan-Rockefeller international investment bankers -- not, it should be noted, the vast bulk of independent American industrialists -- were intimately related to the growth of Nazi industry. It is important to note as we develop our story that General Motors, Ford, General Electric, DuPont and the handful of U.S. companies intimately involved with the development of Nazi Germany were -- except for the Ford Motor Company -- controlled by the Wall Street elite -- the J.P. Morgan firm, the Rockefeller Chase [National Bank] and to a lesser extent the Warburg Manhattan bank. This book is not an indictment of all American industry and finance. It is an indictment of the "apex" -- those firms controlled through the handful of financial houses, the Federal Reserve Bank system, the Bank for International Settlements, and their continuing international cooperative arrangements and cartels which attempt to control the course of world politics and economics."

     

    -Antony Sutton, Wall Street and the Rise of Hitler

     

    It should come as no shock to the attentive student of history that GM's documented affiliation with the Third Reich is more than indicative of their participation in the establishment of the digital, technocratic, global Fourth Reich represented by "Smart Cities" like Tianjin. Equally as indicative are the forces behindGeneral Motors, which, perhaps not coincidentally, are much the same today as they were 80 years ago. During the time period investigated in Wall Street and the Rise of Hitler, GM's largest shareholder was none other than JP Morgan, itself a front for Rothschild interests in America. In the wake of the 2008 "Great Recession," GM was effectively nationalized. One of its subsidiaries explicitly mentioned by Sutton as maintaining ownership of Opel, the General Motors Acceptance Corporation (GMAC), is now controlled by Cerberus Capital Management, owning a 51% stake.

    Cerberus: The three-headed beast, “powerful and without pity,” that guards the gates of Hell in Greek mythology. Fitting.

     

    Cerberus: The three-headed beast, “powerful and without pity,” that guards the gates of Hell in Greek mythology. Fitting.

     

    The international chairman of Cerberus is none other than Dan Quayle, former Vice President under George H.W. Bush, son of Nazi financier Prescott Bush. The same Prescott Bush, it's worth noting, who not only counted himself as a member of Skull and Bones, but also escaped prosecution at Nuremberg despite being identified as the owner of Fritz Thyssen's American shell company, Union Banking Corporation. Perhaps just for old time's sake, Cerberus appointed JP Morgan as its investment fund administrator back in 2011.

     

    ...but they promise they don't fund fascist empires anymore. Just sustainable cities and networked smart cars:

    ChevyTianjin

     

    Doubtlessly, the tank manufacturing assistance provided by the GM of 80 years ago seems far less innocuous than their "Smart Growth" projects of today, like the all-electric, self-driving Chevy EN-V 2.0. Superficially, the shift from military assistance to "green growth" could even be seen in a positive light. But is it? Does a driverless car, whose inherent aim is to limit human control of the machine, make anyone more free or autonomous themselves? Are cars constantly connected to the Internet, laden with microphones, sensors, and geolocation data a liberating technological development in a world where digital snitches in our pockets (smartphones) already run rampant?

     

    After all, the "public-private partnership" between organizations like Google, Microsoft, Apple, and the NSA have already proven these incestuous relationships to be a civil libertarian's worst nightmare. Will a similar relationship between the Chinese government and automotive manufacturers bring about the same results?

     

    From China Daily:

     

    Screenshot from 2015-06-20 13:59:47

     

    The title of China Daily's article requires a slight addendum, as upon further reading of the passage, "Government" deserves pluralization. Evidently, the Chinese Ministry of Environmental Protection requires the sage advice of the American EPA before proceeding in public-private ecstacy:

    DailyChinaEPA1

    Michael Walsh, EPA adviser, speaks before the China Vehicle Emission Control Policy Symposium in Beijing

     

    Michael Walsh, EPA adviser, speaks before the China Vehicle Emission Control Policy Symposium in Beijing

     

    Keeping one's head straight is a constant challenge in the 21st Century. Should I be terrified of China, as many mainstream and alternative news sources beggar of me, as the world is swept by a "New Cold War"? Should I scratch my head in confusion as American corporations, the Chinese government, the United Nations, and the EPA seem so tightly coordinated on pushing forth "sustainable development" despite being supposed "enemies"? Should I outsource my critical thinking and succumb to cognitive dissonance?

     

    Or was Antony Sutton onto something after all?

     

    The Sustainable Trilaterals

     

    Founded in 1973 by David Rockefeller and Zbignew Brzezinski to serve as a coalition of elites within finance and politics from Japan, Europe, and North America, the Trilateral Commission's ostensible purpose is to "foster closer cooperation among these core industrialized areas of the world with shared leadership responsibilities in the wider international system."

     

    The Trilateral Commission's logo - definitely NOT reminiscent of a Swastika

     

    The Trilateral Commission's logo - definitely NOT reminiscent of a Swastika

     

    In reality, the Trilateral Commission is yet another Neomercantile consolidation of political and economic power. Born with the destruction of the Bretton Woods System, Trilateralism attempted to fill the void left in the international monetary system by the lack of a gold trade standard with privately agreed upon trading blocks; in the age before NAFTA, the EU, and TPP, such coalitions between corporations and government were made largely via "Deep Political" actors like the Trilateral Commission (Bilderberg, the Council on Foreign Relations, and Chatham House are three other such Deep Political actors). Over the course of the late-70s and early-80s, Antony Sutton co-authored a series of papers entitled, Trilaterals Over Washington,but in lieu of recounting them here in their entirety, allow this establishment propaganda on the Trilateral Commission from the 1980s sitcom, Barney Miller, to enumerate the Commission's true intentions (masked as comedy, of course):

     

     

    Among the seeming prerequisites for admission to the Church of Globalism, in addition to alignment with the agenda satirically described above, is support of Agenda 21's sustainable development principles, and in this respect, the Trilateral Commission does not disappoint: Maxime Verhagen, Minister of Economic Affairs, Agriculture, and Innovation of the Netherlands, speaks before the Trilateral Commission

     

    Maxime Verhagen, Minister of Economic Affairs, Agriculture, and Innovation of the Netherlands, speaks before the Trilateral Commission in 2011

     

    Nor is such a declaration of "Green Revolution" an isolated incident. The Trilateral Commission maintains a well-sourced adherence to the global vision prescribed in Agenda 21. Trilateralism, since its inception, has had a specific affinity with Asia; originally tasked with merely assimilating Japan, the Commission has since added a number of Asian countries to its repertoire, most notably South Korea. Chinese Trilaterals are still vastly underrepresented, but the organization has taken great care in hand-selecting former diplomats, academics, and businessmen with Chinese experience, as their 2014 roster clearly demonstrates.

     

    Despite Chinese participation in Trilateralism being lax, the presence of Trilateral activity in China erecting Technocratic "Eco-Cities" is to be expected, especially given Trilateral member and Rockefeller "partner" Henry Kissinger's infamous experience in China:

     

    Kissinger's bio as it appears on the Trilateral Commission roster of April 2014

     

    Kissinger's bio as it appears on the Trilateral Commission roster of April 2014

     

    With or without Kissinger's numerous Chinese ventures, the Trilateral Commission has wasted no time installing its agents in "sustainably developing" Tianjin Eco-City. In fact, one of the Trilateral Commission's premier Asian members, Mitsui Fudosan Group of Japan, is a leading development partner in Tianjin's "green" efforts: Screenshot from 2015-06-17 14:14:23

    Mitsui's Trilateral history, as told by the Commission itself

     

    Mitsui's Trilateral history, as told by the Commission itself

     

    And as late as 2014, over 40 years since the Commission's founding, Mitsui still held prominent representation within Trilateralism by way of Takeshi Kunibe from Mitsui Banking and Shoei Utsuda, the Chairman of Mitsui's Board of Directors:

     

    TakeshiTrilateralKunibe-kun and Utsuda-kun as they appear in the Trilateral Commission roster for April 2014

     

    Kunibe-kun and Utsuda-kun as they appear in the Trilateral Commission roster for April 2014

     

    In typical Japanese corporatist fashion, the Eco-Technocracy of Tianjin was a domestic product before being exported to foreign markets. Japan, like much of the Western world, is awash with "sustainable development" projects, but one of its more notable Japanese efforts is Kashiwa-no-ha Smart City. As of June 2015, Kashiwa-no-ha is featured on the homepage of Mitsui Fudosan Group's English page. Upon examination of Kashiwa-no-ha's homepage, Mitsui seems to be, in large part, spearheading this project.

     

    Mitsui Fudosan's home page promoting its Smart City development

    Mitsui Fudosan's home page promotion for its Smart City development

     

    Mitsui is developing Kashiwa-no-ha in line with a true Technocratic vision: A model city in which pervasive, wirelessly-integrated sensors document, trace, track, and surveil every aspect of human life. This data, managed via an Orwellian Smart Center (read: Central Control) will "oversee energy operations, management, and control for the entire town." Constantly conglomerated and organized by central servers and algorithms, Smart Center's data on every aspect of the city is then served up on a silver platter for Academia, another element of Agenda 21's public-private partnerships. Kashiwa-no-ha's residents will be, quite literally, lab rats for the University research labs of Japan. Screenshot from 2015-06-17 14:22:44

     

    Will Mitsui bring to Tianjin the same tightly-controlled, technofeudal model it is developing in Kashiwa-no-ha? Given that Smart Cities the world over, from Masdar to Songdo, have adopted nearly identical models regardless of the "public" or "private" consortium of partners involved, future Chinese Eco-City residents shouldn't hold their breath. Speaking of Songdo (a Korean smart city), across the Sea of Japan lies another Trilateral-affiliated corporation listed as a partner in Tianjin Eco-City, Samsung. The South Korean company's experience in mobile phones and wireless technologies will doubtlessly come in handy when networking the slaves of Smart Cities the world over to Mother Brain, assets for which Samsung's President & COO, Lee Jae-yong, was likely selected for Trilateral membership:

    Lee Jea-yong's bio as it appears on the Trilateral Commission's 2014 roster

     

    Lee Jea-yong's bio as it appears on the Trilateral Commission's 2014 roster

     

    The Songdo International Business District's connect, scan, and surveil model, despite being located in Samsung's home country, was actually developed in partnership with Cisco, who also implemented Masdar City's wireless networking infrastructure. As noted earlier, however, the model from city to city remains nearly identical. Of Songdo, Smart Data Collective says:

     

    "Songdo will become a completely connected city, where almost any device, building or road will be equipped with wireless sensors or microchips. This will result in smart innovations such as streetlights that automatically adjust to the number of people out on the street. All houses in Songdo will be equipped with sensors, also known as domotica, which can be managed via a large TV in the living room of each residency. Next to the homes, these TelePresence screens will be available in all offices, hospitals, schools and shopping centres. The City of Songdo is a futuristic city, completely ready in 2015." via Smart Data Collective

     

    With Songdo's "Internet of Things" niche already filled by Cisco, one might assume that participation by Samsung in Songdo would be redundant. Fortunately for Samsung, it turns out to be a far more versatile company than the average smartphone-toting, LCD-watching American is privy to, as in 2011, Samsung's pharmaceutical division, Samsung Biologics, broke ground on its newest manufacturing facility in Songdo:

     

    Samsung Biologics moves to Songdo, via pharmaceutical-technology.com

     

    Samsung Biologics moves to Songdo, via pharmaceutical-technology.com

     

    A savvy investment for Samsung, surely, as the free medical data mined from Songdo's unwitting populous will be quite handy in manufacturing new alopathic drugs, likely to be sold directly back to the captive and heavily surveiled market that is Songdo.

     

    Sustainability or Bust

     

    Tianjin in China, Songdo in Korea, Kashiwa-no-ha in Japan; Asia is certainly "all in" on sustainability, and given that the development of modern Asian urban centers (pervasive wireless connectivity, electric-powered transit, high density construction, pedestrian-centric urban planning, etc.) are already in line with many "sustainable development" principles, the East is an ideal target for marketing Agenda 21's Smart Cities. Japan in particular is facing a widely publicized demographic crisis, a symptom of which has been the creeping diminishment of rural (mainly farming) villages and towns, another stated aim of the guidelines put forth by the Rio Earth Summit in 1992. The Hegelian crisis of "climate change," the Globalist's deus ex machinaintended to unify mankind against an eternal Straussian enemy, has also been stressed to Eastern populations. Collectivize under the auspices of Eco-Technocracy or face another Fukushimais the implication put forth not only to Japan, but all countries affected by the numerous fault lines in the vicinity of the Sea of Japan. SmartEcoCity, a sustainable development project based out of China, intimates as much in an article published in March of 2014:

    .

     

    Screenshot from 2015-06-17 15:12:23

     

    This orchestrated propaganda campaign aimed at herding rural Korean and Japanese people into Smart Cities goes beyond isolated blog posts by sustainable development firms in China. Korean media is also in full swing propagating the meme that Smart Cities are the perfect escape for victims ravaged by "climate change." In the wake of Fukushima, Yonhap News of Korea published a human interest piece about Japanese citizens displaced in the crisis relocating to none other than Songdo, South Korea.

     

    Problem? "Climate change" is destroying human life and infrastructure throughout the world. Reaction? Devastation, as for the survivors of Fukushima who now find themselves homeless and unemployed. Solution? Be willingly stacked-and-packed in your local Smart City, of course, before such a fate befalls you as well! Truly a Hegelian masterpiece.

     

    No less masterful is mainland China's orchestrated campaign to advertise "Smart Growth," though by a somewhat different tactic: Heavy-handed bureaucracy and overt threats of fines, closure of business, or imprisonment if emission guidelines are not adhered to.

    Screenshot from 2015-06-20 15:13:05

    Screenshot from 2015-06-20 15:18:09

    A recent article from China Daily reporting that "administrative detention" (read: imprisonment) will be exercised for not abiding by sustainable development

     

    A recent article from China Daily reporting that "administrative detention" (read: imprisonment) will be exercised for not abiding by sustainable development

     

    China's "public" expression of the "public-private partnership" paradigm enshrined by Agenda 21 is perfectly in line with its development as a mixed totalitarian/capitalistic state, expressed most recently by new mandates ranking "civic compliance" through social media usage. Civic compliance ratings that will, as planned by Smart Cities, eventually include individual's "eco-friendliness." Between the strict control of China's dictatorial ruling class, American automotive engineering know-how, and the globalized neofeudal model of the Trilateral Commission working in perfect harmony, Chinese Smart Cities like Tianjin have a bright future. Just make sure that light's an LED powered solely by wind, or you may have to be recycled, Comrade.

     

    Conclusions

     

    Sutton's research in the Wall Street series revolved centrally around technological and financial transfers from West to East during World War II and throughout the Cold War to America's supposed enemies. In examining three examples of Anglo-American Establishment corporations implementing Agenda 21 in China, we find these same two elements that Sutton identified in Wall Streetat work in the "public-private partnership" that comprises Tianjin Eco-City: Significant Anglo-American corporations providing technological and financial assistance towards Chinese "Smart Growth" projects. While the wholesale export of American military ingenuity Eastward described by Sutton is beyond the purview of this article, the links that have been enumerated upon here are no less insidious. As informed individuals are privy to, Agenda 21 and the "Eco Tech" movement surrounding it are, Agenda 21 researcher Rosa Korie states, merely a green mask. Behind the mask lies the vision of Brzeiznski, of Huxley, Orwell, and of comptrollers throughout the ages: Nothing short of a society under complete and constant surveillance by governments, academics, and corporations to be managed by a class of "technotronic elites":

     

    "The technotronic era involves the gradual appearance of a more controlled society. Such a society would be dominated by an elite, unrestrained by traditional values. Soon it will be possible to assert almost continuous surveillance over every citizen and maintain up-to-date complete files containing even the most personal information about the citizen. These files will be subject to instantaneous retrieval by the authorities."

     

    -Zbignew Brzezinski, Between Two Ages

     

    The Gestapo attempted to construct the very panopticon described by Brzezinski above; a society greeted by the constant creedo of, "Papers, please," as German citizens shuffled through the streets unaware whether the man next to him should be treated with camaraderie or suspicion. The failure of this goal throughout the 30s and 40s was not for lack of trying, but a simple matter of timing. The technological, automated surveillance of the 21st Century that could make such a society feasible simply did not exist yet. It cannot be said, however, that the Third Reich's efforts were not forward-thinking in this respect, as none other than IBM was contracted to manage the records of citizens slated for "extermination" by the German government. While IBM Analytics didn't exist 80 years ago, their algorithms now in existence, designed to mirror the Pre-Crime of dystopian science fiction of films like likeMinority Report,certainly would have come in handy for Nazi futurists of the era:

     

     

    For Berlin to develop into a "Smart City" capable of such goals would have required nearly a century of thumb-twiddling to bide the time necessary for the technology capable of enabling it to manifest, but for opportunistic leaders of today, no such time need be wasted. One could simply follow the lead of Smart Cities around the globe and install IBM Analytics' citizen management software:

     

    Zhenjiang, China - another Smart City - welcomes IBM Analytics

     

    Zhenjiang, China - another Smart City - welcomes IBM Analytics

     

    Smart Growth in line with Agenda 21's Anglo-American vision is not limited to China or any other geographic region, for that matter; its global spread knows no ethnic or political bounds. Regardless of seeming Western antagonism towards, for example, the BRICS nations, sustainable development principles have been adopted by BRICS at an unprecedented pace. The United Nation's Conference on Trade and Development held late last year published a document entitled, "A BRICS Development Bank: A Dream Coming True?" describing succinctly the UN's desire for the BRICS "New Development Bank" to fund sustainable development projects like Smart Cities. As cited in the publication itself (as well as the examples in the article herein), the BRICS NDB has wasted no time getting in lock-step with their UN, IMF, World Bank, and BIS partners' vision for a "sustainable" world.

     

    These same BRICS countries, many alt-media prognosticators proclaim, are tirelessly working towards supplanting the Anglo-American Establishment in geopolitics and finance. If this is truly the case, the BRICS "anti-hegemon" are either so tactically incompetent as to allow the Trilateral Commission and the computers, algorithms, and sensors of their Globalist affiliates to build their infrastructure, or the BRICS are not nearly as opposed to Global Serfdom as most would have you believe. The evidence suggests the latter to be infinitely more likely than the former.

     

    The development of China's Smart Cities is not overtly warfaric, but their veneer should not dissuade one from realizing the chilling nature of their Anglo-American funded presence. Agenda 21's sustainable development goals are nothing short of an Act of War; not of tanks, bombs, or maimed limbs. Not between clashing superstates, as in wars of the past, but between populations and their own governments.

     

    This challenge is not new or unique to our generation, but its current form and implementation are. Secret police replaced by sensors. Judge and jury supplanted by algorithm. Phone taps replaced with Orwellian "Smart TVs" (Telescreens) and Internet surveillance. Smart Meters to regulate every aspect of human dwellings. Smartphones to track your every movement. Self-driving cars to limit or restrict human mobility. Biotech and pharmaceuticals to regulate the spontaneity inherent in human thoughts and emotions.

     

    The challenge lies in recognizing this glittering Technocratic vision for what it is: Global dictatorship.

     

    Blogging under the pseudonym of Rusticus, the author and freedom activist operates a website tracing the machinations of the Anglo-American Establishment throughout history while simultaneously documenting the process of creating a truly off-grid homestead. (www.statelesshomesteading.com)

     

    {extravote 1}

     

  • Ben Swann Speech & Interview @ The Liberty Summit

    Ben Swann discusses Fascism, Bitcoin, Jury Nullification and working together. Followed by an interview with him.

    Ben Swann

    Campgain for Liberty

     

     

  • Glen Chancy on Red Light Cameras

    We had the pleasure of sitting down with Glen Chancy, the Apopka FL Mayor Hopeful and talking to him about his activism and upcoming Mayorial election.

     

    Glen co-founded banthecams.org in 2009 with Henry Bentley and several other concerned citizens. The economic crisis had hit the year before, and suddenly cash-strapped local governments had begun putting up Redlight Cameras, not only in Apopka but in other Central Florida communities.

     

    Alarmed by the sudden rise in this kind of unconsitutional law enforcement, Glen and Henry launched banthecams.org to bring together like-minded citizens to stop what was clearly an abusive and unjust method of earning revenue for the city’s coffers. Ban The Cams quickly became a rallying point for a diverse coalition of activists looking to combat this injustice.

     

     

     

  • Grammar, Logic and Rhetoric of Police Brutality

    Cop Block Rights

    In this article of Police Brutality, we will be using the Trivium Method of Thinking (Grammar, Logic, and Rhetoric) to address a very real problem with Law Enforcement Officers (LEOs). Grammar is discovering and ordering facts of reality to comprise basic, systematic knowledge. Logic is to develop the faculty of reasoning in establishing valid, non-contradictory understanding of the facts. Rhetoric is applying knowledge and understanding expressively to comprise wisdom or, in other words, it is systematically usable knowledge and understanding.

     

    Part 1: Grammar

    Most Americans cannot deny the rise in police brutality and killings over recent years. We can all site multiple instances brutality and murder cases that spanned throughout our lives. It is a hot button topic that is highly contested by both sides because they have legitimate emotional investments.

     

    Those who support LEOs, whether they are right or wrong, have been helped, saved or have had family members who are LEOs. Those experiences involving LEOs, or having family members in those ranks, will always side on the LEOs side when their safety is concerned; wouldn’t you want them to be safe? One of my favorite family members is a cop. I don’t want him to die, but that doesn’t stop me from trying to talk him out of the job. We all have an innate desire to have security for ourselves and for those we love.

     

    Those of us who are upset with corrupt LEOs and their practices have experiences rooting in reality as those who support all LEOs. We have had personal harassment, friends and loved ones who are beaten and arrested on victimless trumped up charges, and even been a part of families of unarmed human beings, who are not a threat, but still murdered at the hands of an officer that would later be found to have acted within “Police Department procedure.” No one in their right mind could argue that these victims don’t deserve justice.

     

    We want to take a moment to say that WE DO NOT HATE COPS. We understand the need for policing agencies. Even in an Anarchist society communities and individuals would be free to hire people with the purpose of insuring the Non-Aggression Principle (NAP) is not violated. We hate actions of individuals that violate human rights and we are against monopolies of force. We will not be pulled into collectivizing an entire group of people because of their costumes, or better known term - uniforms.

     

    With that said there are a myriad of statistical, philosophical and practical reasons to be incredibly angry with the police system and most of those in it. We have become disenfranchised by those who claim to be our protectors. The Grammar of the situation is tricky. There is no unbiased complete data on police brutality due to self-governing and voluntary reporting which is a direct conflict of interest.

     

    According to F.B.I. Director James Comey:

    “Not long after riots broke out in Ferguson late last summer, I asked my staff to tell me how many people shot by police were African-American in this country. I wanted to see trends. I wanted to see information. They couldn’t give it to me, and it wasn’t their fault. Demographic data regarding officer-involved shootings is not consistently reported to us through our Uniform Crime Reporting Program. Because reporting is voluntary, our data is incomplete and therefore, in the aggregate, unreliable”

     

    We question every statement from a person of power. We looked into Mr. Comey’s claim and he is correct. The F.B.I. does publish a report for “justifiable homicides” by police, but the information for said report is again, all voluntary.

     

    In the words of James Comey:

    “He said he didn’t know whether the Ferguson police shot one person a week, one a year, or one a century, and that in the absence of good data”

     

    D. Brian Burghart, the editor and publisher of the Reno News & Review, has been trying to keep record of every police shooting for the past several years and had this to say about the lack of data:

    “Don’t you find it spookey? This is information, this is the government’s job,” Burghart said. “One of the government’s major jobs is to protect us. How can it protect us if it doesn’t know what the best practices are? If it doesn’t know if one local department is killing people at a higher rate than others? When it can’t make decisions based on real numbers to come up with best practices? That to me is an abdication of responsibilities.”

     

    Now we don’t necessarily agree with his obvious statism, at the federal level, but he does raise a good point. Without proper data how can we come to any sort of conclusion?

     

    To put the final nail in the coffin of the current state of the data about Police Brutality, Jim Fisher, a former FBI agent and criminal justice professor has compiled the most complete data on the subject thus far, had this to say:

    “I was rather surprised to find there are no statistics,” Fisher said. “The answer to me is pretty obvious: the government just doesn’t want us to know how many people are shot by the police every year.”

     

    Unfortunately, the lack of data will not help us reach the Logic of the problem. So, what data do we have that could help us understand the “why”? Training.

     

    One of the very first things a new recruit will be taught is what is commonly referred to as “The first rule of law enforcement.” It was popularized in the movie, The Untouchables. The rule is basic; make sure that you go home at the end of the day and always be on guard because “complacency kills.” Recruits will be shown videos of cops being beaten or killed for the sole purpose of scaring them into the incredibly flawed logic of “Better to be judged by 12 than carried by 6” with every single interaction they have regardless of the individual.

     

    Think about that for a moment. According to that logical fallacy, in the context of their training, it is better to murder an innocent person than to chance the risk of being murdered by a criminal. Is it really? It’s better to be arrested, tried, convicted, torn from your family, which you can no longer support, and have your children live with the fact their parent is in jail for murder, than to die a hero? Neither is desired or optimal but either way you are not going to be there for your loved ones and as a bonus you killed an innocent person.

     

    Immoral training goes further than that. At continuing education seminars around the country, civil forfeiture experts are not only encouraging LEOs to use the practice but offering advice on the best property to seize. In fact, at a conference in Santa Fe, a police officer took the opportunity to belittle forfeiture’s potential impact on the guiltless by attacking the entire concept of an “innocent owner”— someone who has no knowledge his property is being used to commit a crime. Consider a man arrested for soliciting a prostitute while driving his wife’s car. In seizing the car police are, in effect, punishing the innocent betrayed wife.

     

    This is not a hypothetical situation but an actual Supreme Court case. As many as four out of every five seized vehicles are driven by somebody other than the owner. A statutory “innocent owner” defense is often the only way to win back the car (or home, in some cases). Furthermore in a Firearms and Training Simulator (FATS), which police use to train for the “use of force” is designed to teach the officer to kill or die. In an interview with The Free Thought Project, whistleblower cop Alex Salazar gives important insight into this training when he explains:

    “These scenarios are designed to make any person fail and to cause them to believe there are no other options. He had no taser, baton or any other less than lethal weapons. What about kicking the big guy in the nuts, waiting for backup, or tasering him. The profession of law enforcement is difficult at times, but the excessive brainwashing on a daily basis taking place, that you may die, is too extreme and gives many the belief it is OK to use deadly force. In many of these situations, Tamir Rice or Andy Lopez comes to mind, these officer’s just wanted to plain shoot and kill.”

     

    Salazar went on to say, “It’s a brainwashing mechanism to get you over to their side, to start thinking about killing. In what they call the ‘FATS simulator’, you are automatically designed to DIE… Yes it’s a game and useful for training… (But, Also) It has nothing to do with training. Every recruit, I don’t care if they’re an ex-badass Navy Seal… everyone dies.”

     

    According to the factual data about police training our “Peace Officers” are being trained to fear you, to take your most expensive property and if you resist, to murder you ("justifiably" of course). Some of you might be saying to yourselves:

    “But, being a cop is dangerous and they should be trained to stay safe.”

     

    You will get no argument from us about staying safe. Everyone has the right to self-defense, but dangerous? We’ll agree LEOs can get into some pretty dangerous situations, but how dangerous is it? Well in 2013 the garbage industry there were 327 on the job deaths. How many LEOs lost their lives? 97… So being a cop in 2013 was less dangerous than throwing garbage.

     

    Here is a list of the 10 Deadliest Jobs: Deaths per 100,000 (as of 2013) 1. Logging workers: 128.8 2. Fishers and related fishing workers: 117 3. Aircraft pilot and flight engineers: 53.4 4. Roofers: 40.5 5. Structural iron and steel workers: 37 6. Refuse and recyclable material collectors: 27.1 7. Electrical power-line installers and repairers: 23 8. Drivers/sales workers and truck drivers: 22.1 9. Farmers, ranchers, and other agricultural managers: 21.3 10. Construction laborers: 17.4

     

    And where do LEOs fall? In 2013, out of approximately 900,000 sworn officers, 97 died from a job-related injury. That's about 11.1 per 100,000, or a rate of 0.01%. Bear in mind not all officer fatalities are homicides. Out of the 100 deaths in 2013, 31 were shot, 11 were struck by a vehicle, 2 were stabbed, and 1 died in a "bomb-related incident." Other causes of death were: aircraft accident (1), automobile accident (28), motorcycle accident (4), falling (6), drowning (2), electrocution (1), and job-related illness (13). Far from justifying current levels of Police Brutality.

     

    Officer Fatalities

     

    The dangers of being a police officer has been on a steady decline for decades. The last thing we would like to bring up about training is profiling. We’re all aware of racial profiling of minorities, but today we have illogical profiling of Muslims. We are not against profiling as a science, profiling techniques like, micro-expression training, body language and other psychological means of identifying suspects. Crimes must happen first before a profile can be created, which is the opposite of how LEOs are trained.

     

    As an example for 16 years, "mad bomber" George Metesky eluded New York City police. Metesky planted more than 30 small bombs around the city between 1940 and 1956, hitting movie theaters, phone booths and other public areas.

     

    In 1956, the frustrated investigators asked psychiatrist James Brussel, New York State's assistant commissioner of mental hygiene, to study crime scene photos and notes from the bomber. Brussel came up with a detailed description of the suspect. He would be unmarried, foreign, self-educated, in his 50s, living in Connecticut, paranoid and with a vendetta against Con Edison; the first bomb had targeted the power company's 67th street headquarters.

     

    While some of Brussel's predictions were simply common sense, others were based on psychological ideas. For instance, he said that because paranoia tends to peak around age 35, the bomber, 16 years after his first bomb, would now be in his 50s. The profile proved dead on as it led police right to Metesky, who was arrested in January 1957 and confessed immediately.

     

    Today, we aren’t seeing actual psychiatrists or psychologists being called in as an impartial 3rd party to make an unbiased assessment. We’re seeing front line LEOs being trained to hate and distrust Muslims, and by default anyone who looks Muslim, like Sikhs. This is due to the turban. A turban is used as a head covering by many cultures in Africa. Only the high officials in Islam wear turbans and Hindu priests wear turbans as well. Identifying people wearing a turban as a terrorist and making them a target of hatred is completely and morally wrong.

     

    In 2010 at Broward College in Davie, Florida, about sixty police officers and other frontline LEOs gathered in a lecture hall for a course on combating terrorism in the Sunshine State. The instructor, Sam Kharoba, described how he would teach his audience the fundamentals of Islam. “We constantly hear statements,” Kharoba began, “that Islam is a religion of peace, and we constantly hear of jihadists who are trying to kill as many non-Muslims as they can.” Kharoba’s course would establish for his students that one of these narratives speaks to a deep truth about Islam, and the other is a calculated lie.

     

    In this class Kharoba said. “Would Islam be tolerated if everyone knew its true message?” he then asked the class. “From a Muslim perspective, do you want non-Muslims to know the truth about Islam?”

     

    “No!” came the audience reply.

    “So what do Muslims do?” Kharoba demanded.

    “Lie!”

     

    Kharoba strode forward to the front of the room. “Islam is a highly violent radical religion that mandates that all of the earth must be Muslim.”

     

    Kharboa then asked, “You remember the Alligator Alley incident?”.

     

    He was referring to the events of September 13, 2002, when three Middle Eastern men at a Shoney’s restaurant in Calhoun, Georgia were overheard talking about “bringing it down” to Miami. A nearby diner became alarmed contacted the Georgia highway patrol. In what became a terrorist scare with national coverage, the police pulled the three men over on Alligator Alley, the long section of Interstate 75 that cuts west across Florida. For thirteen hours, the police combed the vehicle for explosives finding zero evidence of anything terrorist or criminally related.

     

    Kharoba projected a picture of Ayman Gheith, one of the arrested men, onto the screen. “The first thing is facial hair,” Kharoba said. “Do you see how the moustache is trimmed, and the beard is in a cone shape? It is very common to have this beard, and the moustache will always be the same, just like Muhammad.”

     

    There is only one problem with the Alligator Alley case — a problem Kharoba never mentioned to the class. The incident was a false alarm. The “terrorists” turned out to be medical students on their way to a conference in Miami. They were unquestionably innocent. After thirteen hours of interrogation the police released them with a “my bad” and a pat on the ass. Kharoba, however, taught the class that Ayman Gheith was a “textbook case” of Islamic fanaticism.

     

    So, we have one question about this type of teaching. Can we hire actual experts instead people like Kharoba? He had no professional experience in law enforcement, no academic training in terrorism or national security, and is not a Muslim. Kharoba is a Jordanian-born Christian that was able to turn his place of birth into a selling and talking point. When Alternet.org asked the dean of the Institute of Public Safety why she recruited Kharoba to teach there, her answer was that Kharoba “put the flavor of Middle Eastern culture into it.”

     

    Kharoba is an especially colorful character, but he is in some ways typical of the kinds of people who have migrated into the police counterterrorism training business. Many have limited background in U.S. counterterrorism and domestic law enforcement with little patience for the rules and conventions that govern both fields.

     

    So, just a quick recap: Objectively, police are being trained to fear every interaction with a “citizen”, regardless of their innocence or guilt, on the false premise that their job is one of the most dangerous profession that an individual can have. They are also being trained (for the lack of a better term) to steal from the average American. They are being trained with immoral instructions on how to profile. This information alone leads to even more questions about why and how this is happening. Especially since it is safer to be an officer now than ever before since the 1900’s.

     

    Another piece of Grammar that we need to address is the philosophy behind police. We can start with the clichéd motto “To protect and serve.” It’s a nice slogan, but what does it really mean?

     

    Protect comes directly from Late Latin protectionem (nominative protectio) "a covering over," noun of action from protegere "protect, cover in front," from pro- "in front" + tegere "to cover".

     

    Now things get interesting with serve. Serve comes from Latin servire "be a servant, be in service, be enslaved;" figuratively "be devoted; be governed by; comply with; conform; flatter," originally "be a slave," related to servus "slave".

     

    So the phrase, “To protect and serve” can be said to mean; “To stand in front to provide cover and to be a servant (or slave).” The question we need to ask now is; to stand and cover whom and to be a servant or slave to who? Have they become the shields and slaves for the corrupt?

     

    We will end this part of the article with a reiteration. WE DO NOT HATE POLICE, but just like anyone who is in a position of authority or entrusted to make snap decisions about people’s safety, they must be held to a higher standard. Right now as it stands their ethical bar is set to a lower standard than it is for us.

     

    In part 2 of this article we’ll attack the Logic (or lack thereof) behind militarization and the rise of police brutality.

     

    {extravote 1}

     

  • Interview with Patriot Gardens, Food Freedom, Property Rights

    Jason and Jennifer Helvenston of Patriot Gardens talk with Robert about their struggle and triumph over intrusive government. They have plans to help you do the same and teach you to be self sufficient.

     

    Patriot Gardens

    Patriot Gardens Facebook

    Also check out the Food Freedom Initiative

     

    {extravote 1}

  • Lego Movie Review: Not just for statists

    Lego Movie

    Not too long ago, my co-host and friend, Matthew Dalton, suggested I take my kids to go see Lego movie. He told me that it was "anarchist propaganda" and my God, was it ever. I must warn you, I am about dissect and analyze all of the fun out of this movie (my editor says I'm supposed to type *Spoiler Alert* here) and I will not feel sorry about it. The movie begins when a wizard, Vitruvius, attempts to protect the "Kragle," a super weapon, from the evil President Business (an obvious poke at both government and cronyism,) who wants to use it to freeze the universe as it has been built by him. Vitruvius fails to stop him, but warns Lord Business of a prophecy where a person called the "Special" will find the Piece (Peace?) of Resistance capable of stopping the Kragle. I identified the typical tropes in a children's movie. You know, like, slapstick, references and parodies of known characters, The Chosen one, ect. ect. I was then introduced to the main character, Emmet Brickowski, an ordinary construction worker, and was given a not-so-subtle message about how it is necessary to conform and have blind acceptance of instruction to be happy.



    The part that made me say to myself, "The most staunch indictment of the culture of control that is pushed in Mainstream Media/Politics today is when the main character literally forgets his clothes without instruction to remind him." You might be familiar with that argument. "Without the law, how will people know how to be civil?" When in reality they are saying, "People are too stupid to regulate themselves and, apparently, will forget to dress in the morning."

     

    "Are not laws dangerous which inhibit the passions? Compare the centuries of anarchy with those of the strongest legalism in any country you like and you will see that it is only when the laws are silent that the greatest actions appear." -Marquis de Sade

     

    Following that scene, I was magically taken back to a time in my life when "fitting in" was important.

     

     

     

    Do you remember that time in your life? When you were easily influenced by the trends of society either through pop culture, politics, or your parents? The amount of time spent in that state of unaware malleability differs per individual because of environment, genetics and willpower. Emmet feels a very real need to be both a part of something bigger than himself and to stand out and be noticed. It is a paradox that all humans share. In his desire to be noticed, he did everything he was told to do, simply so that he might be considered be a part of something bigger. As most of us know, now that we are older, when you judge your own importance by the standards of others you will always eventually fail.

     

    "The roots of the word 'anarchy' are 'an archos,' 'no leaders,' which is not really about the kind of chaos that most people imagine when the word 'anarchy' is mentioned. I think that anarchy is, to the contrary, about taking personal responsibility for yourself." -Alan Moore

     

    After being shown that Emmet is so absolutely and entirely normal that he isn't even noticed by his peers, He comes across a woman, Wyldstyle, who is searching for something after hours at Emmet's construction site. When he investigates, Emmet falls into a hole and finds the Piece of Resistance. Compelled to touch it, Emmet experiences vivid visions and passes out. He awakens elsewhere with the Piece of Resistance attached to his back in the custody of Bad Cop, Lord Business' lieutenant, whose alter-ego is, of course, Good Cop. Let's stop here to introduce you to Good Cop/Bad Cop:

     

    “Power changes everything till it is difficult to say who are the heroes and who the villains.” ― Libba Bray, The Sweet Far Thing

     

    Bad Cop has a good side which still holds some influence over Bad Cop. Eventually, Good Cop is erased by President Business, which is a clear indictment of the police force today. If you work for an evil regime and never question orders, no matter how good a person you are on the inside, you will eventually have all that is good about you erased... but I digress. There, Emmet learns of Business' plans to freeze the world with the Kragle. Wyldstyle rescues Emmet and takes him to Vitruvius, who explains that he and Wyldstyle are "Master Builders" capable of building anything they need, both with great speed and without instruction manuals; when Lord Business rose to power, his disapproval of such anarchic creativity resulted in him capturing many of them.

     

    "Following the Inquisition's injunction against Galileo, the papal Master of the Sacred Palace ordered that Foscarini's Letter be banned, and Copernicus' De revolutionibus suspended until corrected. The papal Congregation of the Index preferred a stricter prohibition, and so with the Pope's approval, on March 5 the Congregation banned all books advocating the Copernican system, which it called "the false Pythagorean doctrine, altogether contrary to Holy Scripture.""

     

    As the "Special," Emmet is destined to defeat him, yet Wyldstyle and Vitruvius are disappointed to find Emmet displays no creativity. Now some of you are already aware of the "reluctant hero" trope. As a matter of fact, Ron Paul would be an excellent real-world parallel of this phenomenon. How many times have you heard, "I like Ron Paul except for...." Wyldstyle and Vitruvius take Emmet to an underground resistance where there is no instructions or rules. He obviously doesn't understand how a society can exists without rules.



    It is here where Emmet tries to take on the role of the Special and gives a very honest speech, causing the Master Builders to doubt him and his ability to change the world.

     

    "I have no experience fighting, leading or making plans. It's going to be really hard, but I..." -Emmet

     

    Soon, the Cops find the underground resistance and Emmet and his friends must run and hide. We are then treated to this wonderfully anarchic scene.



    First, we see many different people working together, yet separately, to achieve a common goal, and when Emmet asks to be told what to do, he is told not to worry about what the others are doing and do what is special to him. Jumping ahead in the story, Emmet is eventually told by Vitruvius that the Prophecy of the Special is made up and there is no such thing as the Special. It is when Emmet accepts this truth, that he is just one person whose ideas are not better or worse than anyone else, that he steps up to being a hero. That is the heart of Anarchism/Voluntaryism. No one is greater or worse than you. There are no bad ideas, just bad actions. No one should rule you or make you follow instruction just because they feel you should. I could go on and on about the parallels that were drawn in this movie to Anarchism and Voluntaryism, but I will let Emmet close this article for me.

     

    "You don't have to be the bad guy. You are the most talented, most interesting, and most extraordinary person in the universe. And you are capable of amazing things. Because you are the Special. And so am I. And so is everyone. The prophecy is made up, but it's also true. It's about all of us. Right now, it's about you. And you... still... can change everything." -Emmet

     

    {extravote 1}

     

  • Mind the Control Podcast #1: American Cowboys

     

    Listen to Stitcher

    “The American people don’t read.”-Allen Dulles, Director of Central Intelligence

    Perhaps the most infamous of all American “intelligence” agencies, the CIA (or The Company, as they so often refer to themselves) is an agency mired in controversy, blood, and conspiracy. On this inaugural episode of Mind the Control, we present a thorough primer on CIA, its origins, history, and activities in the present day. What can the founding of The Company tell us about its purpose and function? Who does the agency work for, exactly?

     

    Shownotes

    0:00:12 – Hand On Your Gun by Lowkey
    0:00:48 – Michael Ruppert Confronts CIA Director John Deutch
    0:01:58 – Russia Today’s Abby Martin on Iran Contra and the CIA Cocaine/Heroin Conspiracy
    0:07:26 – Michael Ruppert’s Truth and Lies of 9/11 lecture
    0:32:20 – Introduction Monologue
    0:37:03 – The Origins of US Intelligence lecture by Dave Emory
    2:35:51 – The Last CIA Whistleblower, an interview with John Stockwell
    3:20:11 – Al Qaeda Doesn’t Exist Part 2, a documentary by James Corbet of The Corbett Report
    3:28:37 – Dr. Colin Ross on CIA Mind Control Programs
    3:41:03 – CIA and Drug Running lecture by Michael Ruppert
    4:48:03 – The Boston Bombing, the CIA, and the US Empire with Sibel Edmonds and Lew Rockwell

     

    {extravote 1}

     

  • Remember Remember Remember

     

     

    There are times when happiness needs to be a priority in life. Your health and sanity depends on it. Sometimes that happiness can come from simply turning off the TV and avoiding mainstream media, fake news. What is fake news? Who determines what fake news is? Do you really trust the government, its rhetoric, and mainstream media controlled propaganda? Some fake news is used to entertain, satire news, but others are used to confuse and control you. Fake news is used to make people forget the truth.

     

    People forget all the things!

    • People forget that the government constantly breaks promises it makes.
    • People forget that the innocent were rounded up and kidnapped by being held in Japanese Internment Camps.
    • People forget that farmers started a rebellion, the Whiskey Rebellion, in protest against an excise tax imposed on them which was quelled by George Washington and over 10 thousand militiamen resulting in hundreds arrested for treason.
    • People forget the government poisoned and murdered over 10,000 people to try and stop them from drinking alcohol when it was banned by the government.
    • People forget that the government slaughtered Native Americans, at Wounded Knee, who committed no crimes.
    • People forget that the CIA kidnapped and tortured the innocent under the MKUltra project.
    • People forget that the government conducted eugenics, which was developed by the Nazis.
    • People forget police in Philadelphia dropped bombs on a black neighborhood killing 11 people in total, 5 of them children, resulting fire burned down 60 homes.
    • People forget that a crime is anything that goes against what someone else wishes and was able to convince a small group of people to agree to.
    • People forget that the Constitution should be taken literally, 2nd Amendment - self defense is a right and the right to bear arms “shall not be infringed”.
    • People forget that the government will kill you if you stand up to them.
    • People forget that the government made it illegalto feed the homeless.
    • People forget there is no law too small that the government will not kill you over.
    • People forget police are fallible, humans - same as the criminals they chase, and cover up murders to protect themselves and their partners.
    • People forget politicians are fallible, like police and criminals, and are capable in committing crimes.
    • People forget Clinton committed crimes.
    • People forget Clinton pushed fake news to cover up her screw ups that cost lives.
    • People forget the DNC engaged in fraud by stealing the election nominee from Sanders and giving it to Clinton.
    • People forget the DNC and Clinton had a third party start violence at Trump rallies.
    • People forget Clinton pushed for Trump to be the GOP nominee.
    • People forget the Clintons take money from the Saudi's.
    • People forget the Saudi's financed the attacks on 9/11/01.
    • People forget that jet fuel cannot melt steel beams and that three buildings were demolished.
    • People forget the Pentagon announced that it lost 2.3 Trillion on 9/10/2001.
    • People forget that the Pentagon announced on 6/2016 that the Army made 6.5 Trillion wrongful accounting entries in 2015, resulting in an unknown amount of money being lost.
    • People forget that some in the government have ties to convicted child sex trafficking criminals and pedophiles.
    • People forget Clinton's vice chair of her 2016 campaign, Huma Abedin, is married to a pedophile.
    • People forget that a former GOP House Speaker (second in line for the presidency), Dennis Hastert, is a convicted pedophile.
    • People forget that a former DNC Representative, Keith Farnham, is a convicted pedophile.
    • People forget other governments' elites have been involved in child sex scandalswith some being convicted pedophiles.
    • People forget those in power will cover up horrible crimes they are involved in.
    • People forget that hundreds of Pentagon employees have been caughtpurchasing child pornography but the investigation was terminated before being completed.
    • People forget that any allegation of child sex should be thoroughly investigated and that Pizzagate was not investigated.
    • People forget that there are many other instances where the government pushes fake news while keeping real news quiet.

     

    People forget many things but mostly they forget the truth. Currently, most are blinded by the fake news about "fake news".

     

    Fake - of unknown origin; attested in London criminal slang as adjective (1775 "a counterfeit"), verb (1812 "to rob"), and noun (1851, "a swindle;" of persons 1888, "a swindler"), but probably older. A likely source is feague "to spruce up by artificial means," from German fegen "polish, sweep," also "to clear out, plunder" in colloquial use.

     

    News – late 14c. “new things”

     

    Fake news is defined as new things that are counterfeit which is used to rob and swindle the truth from you.

     

    People need to remember all the things!

    • People need to remember that the root definition of government means "control", which is the opposite of freedom.
    • People need to remember that "fake news" is government rhetoric used as a form of control.
    • People need to remember that they have Natural Rights that they are born with, rights are not granted to you by the government, which are violated daily by the government and its' enforcers.
    • People need to remember that police officers (the job) are policy enforcers for those ruling over us, not peace officers, who violate the rights of the innocent daily.
    • People need to remember that police and those ruling over us are paid through theft, because taxation is theft.
    • People need to remember that positions of authority and badges do not grantextra rights.
    • People need to remember that government is the problem, not the solution.
    • People need to remember that what made America great was the very act of defiance against an oppressive tyrannical government, Make America Defiant Again.

     

    People need to learn all the things!

     

     

    People forget, people remember, people learn... Sadly most tend to forget more often than they remember or learn, or they remember and learn only what the government tells them or pushes scripted mainstream media fake news. Time to break this vicious cycle is now. Change starts with you. You can make a difference if you remember and learn. This can be done by starting with your grammar. If you have other items to add please do so in the comments.

     

  • This December, Agenda 21 is Getting an "Update"

    Source: Stateless Homesteading

    From November 30th to December 11th of 2015, a consortium of world "leaders" from 190 countries will gather in Paris, France as part of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. The occasion? The much maligned Neomalthusian "environmental" program, known as "Agenda 21" by its original visionaries as well as its opponents, will be of drinking age, its "sustainable" protocols having been officially adopted in 1994.

     

    So, too, is this UN Convention in Paris a celebration of the Kyoto Protocol's numerological accomplishments, as COP21/CPM11 marks the 11th year of the emission regulation's force as "International Law" (as of 2004).

     

    The purpose of these festivities, however, is hardly mere ceremony; as Agenda 21 comes of age, the burdens it places upon those living beneath its yoke are also maturing. Unlike every UN Climate Convention since Rio 1992, which were mere "global visioning" seminars, COP21, according to the Anglo-American Cambridge University, has far more grandiose and binding aspirations:

     

    "The United Nations Climate Change Conference, COP21 or CMP11 will be held in Paris, France in 2015. The international climate conference will be held from 30 November to 11 December 2015. The conference objective is to achieve a legally binding and universal agreement on climate, from all the nations of the world."

     

    -Cambridge Interdisciplinary Research on the Environment

     

    In other words, Agenda 21 v2.0 will soon be upon us. Information on what exactly this "upgrade" entails for Free Humanity is sparse, as the UN remains resolutely vague (perhaps deliberately, given recent notoriety surrounding "sustainable development") on the specifics of the Convention's "binding and universal agreement." Yet in spite of Globalism's sincere attempt to obfuscate Neofeudal Technocracy's latest iteration, open-source intelligence can give us a glimpse behind the proverbial curtain at the magic tricks in store at COP21 this December.

     

    All the World's a (Sustainable) Stage

     

    As the curtain begins to rise on Act 2 of Agenda 21, it's worth reminding ourselves of the nodes of forensic history which lead to COP21. Perhaps the most integral of these nodes is the research produced by whistleblower and activist, George Washington Hunt, in his party-crashing exploits at the pre-Rio planning committees of the early-90s, attended by such Globalist "luminaries" as Maurice Strong and Edmond de Rothschild; all of whom were caught on tape by Hunt's daring infiltration:

     

    Even more undercirculated than Hunt's video presentation are the documents this Conference produced. It is within these Anglophilic pages that the World Order created by Agenda 21 is spelled out with stunning clarity - particularly as it pertains to the "developing" world, China and India chief among them: UNCED1China and India's "conditions" for signing on to the Rio '92 agenda as documented by the UN Environment and Development Conference

     

    China and India's "conditions" for signing on to the Rio '92 agenda, as documented by the UN Conference on Environment and Development

     

    China and India, recognizing the influence their signatures (or lack thereof) would have on adopting Agenda 21 globally, told the UN succinctly: "We haven't come here for 'aid' (IMF loans). Instead, we want in on the Western game of 'Global Trade' (Neomercantilism). Give us a slice of the wealth pie (compensatory financial flows) or we're not signing up." History informs us, however, that China and India did sign up for Rio's binding protocols. The past twenty-odd years also spell out quite clearly that the Anglo-American Establishment has fulfilled its side of the wager to her former colonies. This "Faustian Bargain" has made India and China rich, but at what cost?

     

    UNCED3

     

    Was the price paid by India and China their economic autonomy? While it's certain that the Indian caste system and the "State Capitalist" collectivism of modern China are hardly beacons of "liberal free market" activity, their development includes elements of this therein; in fact, Eastern banking systems grow more "Anglo-Saxon" in ideal and structure by the day, despite the facade of independence being maintained.

     

    This blend of Western structure with Eastern identity in banking strikes one as the potential compromise reached between the "First" and "Second" worlds at UNCED - a final bid to maintain the "Anglo-Saxon system of banking":

     

    UNCED5

     

    The Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank (or AIIB) is an excellent example of this burgeoning "East-Anglo" banking model. While widely reported by some as signifying the end of the decaying Western banking model, the AIIB's steadfast devotion to Agenda 21 makes one wonder whether or not the AIIB is a truly autonomous entity, or merely China's fulfillment of an Asian Development Bank or Development Bank of Latin America-style puppet as called for by Rio '92:

     

    AIIB1Jin Liqun, secretary general of the bank's multilateral interim secretariat, tells Xinhua on the topic of the AIIB. From China Daily and Reuters.

     

    Jin Liqun, secretary general of the bank's multilateral interim secretariat, tells Xinhua on the topic of the AIIB. From China Daily and Reuters.

     

    It seems the AIIB plans not only on investing in "green" infrastructure projects, but will do so in partnership with the Globalist World Bank and ADB, both of which were set up by the West following the devastation of World War II. Christine Lagarde and the IMF, too, state that they would be "Delighted" to work with the AIIB.  Is this new system of banking and financing what Edmond de Rothschild meant when he referenced a "Second World Marshall Plan" in relation to Agenda 21, as described in Hunt's recording? Is this why "developing  nations should look to Germany and Japan," countries rebuilt by World Bank funding, for their banking models, as described in the UNCED document?

     

    One must bear in mind that the United Nations Council on Trade and Development (UNCTAD) quoted in the document above is the same group which authored the paper, "A BRICS Development Bank - A Dream Coming True?" in March of 2014, which heralds the rise of the BRICS New Development Bank as a global force for "sustainable development" and an ardent partner in Agenda 21:

     

    BRICSDBThe BRICS to put "development on center stage," as called for in the UNCED documentation

     

    The BRICS to put "development on center stage," as called for in the UNCED documentation

     

    And thus, a pattern emerges - the "New Kids on the Trading Bloc" and their corresponding banks are, universally, in lock-step with Agenda 21 and the multipolar Technocratic Order it represents. From sustainable banking to metals exchanges, the infrastructure required by a reinvention of the Global Order seems to be in place in advance of COP21, with the exception of at least one key element: A global carbon credit scheme.

     

    Carbon Credits Cometh

    Much ado has been made recently within the alternative media about the IMF's decision to delay inclusion of the Yuan into the SDR basket until September of 2016, with various theories floated as to why this has occurred. Viewing this announcement within the context of COP21's heavy emphasis on the future of carbon trading markets, a piece of the Yuan-SDR puzzle falls into place; if what anti-Technocracy researchers like Patrick Wood have unveiled is true, Global Technocracy's Neomalthusian environmental implements must also develop in tandem with a new currency system underpinned by energy credits. The pre-release documents from COP21's "Scientific and Technological Advice" PDF, as well as COP21's sponsors, hint at this being an integral part of the discussions taking place in December:

     

    COP21Tech2CTXPartner21CarbonTrackerPartner21

     

    One key country expected to be signatory to COP21's treaty has revealed that they are not yet ready for the "new market-based mechanism" the UN will require: China. The Chinese National Development and Reform Commission announced that their national carbon trading markets will not be ready until late 2016 at the earliest:

     

    CDCarbon1From China Daily

     

    From China Daily

     

    So it seems the IMF has delayed the Yuan's SDR inclusion for almost exactly as long as it will take for China to launch its national carbon trading scheme - is this mere coincidence? The timing of these moves strikes this author as potentially significant.

     

    The launch of this national program will be built on the foundationof the regional carbon markets China has been fostering over the past few years, one of which should be familiar to us:

     

    CDCarbon3

     

    The site of the Trilateral-assisted "Eco-City," Tianjin, is also the site of China's pilot carbon trading market; the same Tianjin whose "not-so-smart" counterpart was recently set ablaze by a mysterious explosion, ostensibly caused by "chemicals."

     

    If the "problem" of unsustainable manufacture and development wasn't clear to China's human resources before last week, it is now.

     

    Hegel 21

     

    "...back then, we were talking about projections of a problem (Climate Change) with literally no solutions that we could talk about. And that is, for people, just not going to work. People need to know that there's hopefulness before they're gonna even admit there's a problem. If you give them a problem and there's no solution, they pretend it doesn't happen.

     

    We've been doing that for 25 or 30 years.

     

    What we see now is that we actually have solutions, and we're actually being hit with the problem now."

     

    -Gina McCarthy, EPA Administrator

     

    This is how the head of the EPA, Gina McCarthy, chose to frame the Obama Administration's implementation of the Malthusian "Clean Power Plan" during her tell-a-vision appearance with Bilderberger and CFR member Charlie Rose. Sound familiar? The Hegelian Dialectic strikes again, only this time, on a global stage. The mass of the public, properly conditioned to accept "Climate Change" as the Harbinger of Doom, is now prepared for the solutions phase of Eco-Fascism: The final round of de-industrialization and centralization of the American power grid.

     

    This latest Hegelian trick's synthesis, birthed from the antithesis represented by the EPA's slashing of American carbon emissions, must inevitably include the rapid development of American "renewable" power:

     

    From The Guardian

     

    From The Guardian

     

    Regardless of the "winner" of the 2016 Presidential (s)election, the mechanics for such a program are already well underway at the Corporatist level, as China, the largest solar panel producing country on Earth, is well underway in supplying American solar infrastructure: Screenshot from 2015-08-14 14:02:47

     

    In the case of Suniva's purchase by Shunfeng Clean Energy, China's solar juggernaut worth over $20 billion, the merger will be underwritten by two powerful forces of Anglo-American wealth as well:

     

    goldmanwarburgchinasolar

     

    The Warburg banking family and the ever-present Goldman Sachs are steadfast in their support of this "sustainable" trend. A safe bet, surely, as the Obama Administration's "Clean Power Act" virtually requires a tremendous uptick in solar panel manufacture for the West. COP21 is set to require even more. Will the "cheap money for cheap goods" and "cheap precious metal for cheap bonds" relationship between China and the West soon be joined by a "carbon credits for cheap solar panels" arrangement? As "experts" on the East-West Dialectic and originators of the term BRICs as early as 2003, Goldman seems to be betting that this is the case: Screenshot from 2015-07-28 23:24:10Screenshot from 2015-07-28 23:24:27

     

    One may recall a recent post, "China 21: Anglo-American Sustainability in Asia," in which this author noted the Hegelian Dialectic's use to usher survivors of Fukushima into Agenda 21 "Smart Cities." We see these same "Thesis, Antithesis, Synthesis" tactics at work in the rubble of Tianjin. Whoever or whatever caused the Tianjin blast, whether or not this is a case of a synthetic event or simply a matter of "never letting a good crisis go to waste," the reality of the situation is unchanged: The old Tianjin is in ruin, whereas Tianjin Eco-City, located outside of the blast radius, remains in tact with its scheduled completion in 2020 unhindered: TianjinBlast1 From ChannelNewsAsia

     

    From ChannelNewsAsia

    In tandem with "old" Tianjin's destruction, degradation of air quality is also being reported surrounding the blast site; air quality issues that, presumably, would not exist had Tianjin Eco-City been at full capacity and the environmental standards of COP21 been fully developed:

     

    COP21Tech1

     

    Tianjin Eco-City, unlike its counterpart, already includes a "greenhouse gas data interface," a trait shared by every Smart City on planet Earth. Nor would Tianjin Eco-City's "Eco-Industrial Park" have allowed such volatile and "unsustainable" manufacturing to take place in the first place. This is the thesis as constructed in the Hegelian programming surrounding the Tianjin catastrophe.

     

    All that's left now is for transnational Technocrats to wait in anticipation for the ultimate synthesis to be unveiled this December at COP21, and given the grand overtures being prepared by all nations in advance of the Paris conference, the "legally binding and universal agreement" it will produce is set to be no less bombastic.

     

    The specifics of the threat posed by COP21 to Free Humanity can only be divined upon the gathering's close, but its overall aspirations are known to us. They are the same in 2015 at COP21 as they were at Rio in 1992; the same today as in 1972 with the Club of Rome's publication ofThe Limits to GrowthNothing short of global colonization by the Anglo-American Establishment, as admitted at UNCED '92:

     

    UNCED4

     

    To the "billions of Lilliputians of lesser race" out there, myself included, we have been warned. The Hour is Late. Whether the Fabian degradation of freedom and prosperity continue their steady grind or the world is "compelled" by economic catastrophe into implementing "Global Sustainability" as foretold by Maurice Strong, the remainder of 2015 and 2016 are set to be a turbulent period in this ongoing Age of Transitions.

    Amidst the potential tumult that Act 2 of Agenda 21 and other geopolitical events may yield, just remember, Reader:

     

    "You either learn your way towards writing your own script in life, or you unwittingly become an actor in someone else's script." -John Taylor Gatto

     

    Blogging under the pseudonym of Rusticus, the author and freedom activist operates a website tracing the machinations of the Anglo-American Establishment throughout history while simultaneously documenting the process of creating a truly off-grid homestead. (www.statelesshomesteading.com)

     

    {extravote 1}

     

  • Violent Revolution Or Peaceful Evolution?



    Violent Revolution or Peaceful Evolution

    Are we spearheading a peaceful evolution or delaying a violent revolution? I have recently had my worldview shaken by an article written by Christopher Cantwell called, "Violently Overthrow The Government." The reason for said shaking is because it scared me to my very core; not because I am scared of a violent revolution. If that must take place, then so be it. It scared me because I have put all my faith and work into the belief of a peaceful evolution. Chris destroyed it in a single  article, albeit a long one, with logic and within the boundaries of the Non-Aggression Principle.

     

    First let me say that I, in no way, support the killing of anyone, even if they wear a funny costume and shiny badges. I judge individuals on their own actions and won't blame one costumed man for the actions of another. I want with the deepest of my being for every one of my fellow human beings to wake up tomorrow and be free along with me. I base my life around education and truth with the intention of helping others to think for themselves.

     

    That being said, I also fully support, believe in, promote, and have a basic human right to self defense. If someone tries to kidnap, steal from, or attack me, I have the right to defend myself and my property. If necessary, I can kill my aggressor. I would feel sad for the loved ones survived by said attacker, but have no remorse for the attacker himself.

     

    Now that I have set a standard of my thinking, let's get into the article.

     

    Chris first shows the logical and factual failings of democracy, civil disobedience, education and peaceful parenting. These are not new ideas, not new practices and history shows that the State, in the end, will prevail. So, where does that leave us?

     

    My proposal, and in all honesty, I’m still working out the details, has been to resort to force. For free men and women to forcefully defend themselves against agents of the State. To kill government agents who would otherwise use force against them, until their jobs simply become so dangerous that they seek other lines of work. -Cantwell

     

    He isn't calling for a violent "revolution" per se, but for already free men and women to defend themselves against already established aggressors.  He isn't purposing that we organize together and insert new leaders and elected officials. Just defend yourself and, if you are a moral man/woman, your neighbors and fellow humans.

     

    No, the goal of overthrow must be to put an end to the State, not shuffle the deck. -Cantwell

     

    Honestly, I can understand and even agree with that reasoning. It is both logical and moral. If he was asking for us to just start killing agents of the state at random, then I could not support his stance. He isn't asking that; only that you defend yourself when they aggress against you. My nagging question, even though I may agree to a point, is, "Are the state of affairs bad enough to warrant such actions and if they are, how do you achieve this without just being some uprising that was quickly quelled?"

     

    The most attractive part of force, is that it requires the fewest participants...... Let us assume that the average cop writes 10 traffic tickets per day. If 5% of the population of a given geographic area simply understood that force was necessary and proper, a police officer would be coming into contact with one of those people roughly every other day. Up that number to 10%, or be in a place where police write more than 10 tickets a day, and the likelihood of such an encounter becomes much greater. -Cantwell

     

    In the last paragraph of the article I see, what I believe, to be Cantwell's true intentions of writing this gut wrenching and paradigm shaking article.

     

    Those who have attempted to avoid this discussion, such as Stefan Molyneux, and the Free State Project, do so at the peril of their own credibility, and do a disservice to those who they would claim to be trying to help. This discussion is happening with or without you, and if you really think I’m that far off base, then the proper way to handle that is to make a coherent response. Shutting down the lines of communication only proves that you don’t have one. -Cantwell

     

    Aha! Seriously though. Why isn't this a discussion? Is it so unbelievable that sometime in the future retaliation against the State will be necessary?

     

    Luckily, someone I respect answered the call of violent revolution or peaceful evolution. Derrick J Freeman! I was excited. He even titled it Chris Cantwell is All Wrong. I was going to have my faith in peaceful resistance restored because I was, unfortunately, unable to destroy Cantwell's logic. I was hopeful.

     

    What it comes down to is a war of ideas. If all the world’s a stage, and we all the players, then let us demonstrate for the world what a free society can look like. Let us provide the example and be the light on the hill. Let us provide alternatives to the things the state provides, like food and care for the old and needy. -Derrick J

     

    Yes!!

     

    The people have to be won, they have to be sold on the idea. -Derrick J

     

    YES!!!

     

    And listen, you’re picking the wrong battle. You’re outmatched. There will never be a successful violent revolt in America; it will be squashed. No, like the Cyclops in the Odyssey, free humanity must outwit the sociopaths to defeat them. -Derrick J

     

    BOOM! Come at me Bro!

     

    There’s nothing special about you or this time. You aren’t owed freedom in your lifetime, but you can have it....If your self-interest is personal freedom, then live free and take the consequences.... -Derrick J

     

    Halleluj.... wait...

     

    I am a free and unique human being, that makes me special. That's why killing is wrong. Everyone is special. And in the truest sense of time, "now" is the most important time. You're right about not being "owed" freedom because it is already mine, but that won't stop a Cop/FBI/Military from killing me if they so wish.

     

    Live free and take the consequences? I could agree with that IF one were talking about the consequences of not saving enough money or seeding my fields too late in the season, but I should "take" being beaten by costumed criminals for smoking a flower?

     

    Derrick's article left me wanting. He made some substantive points, but didn't address the issue that people are dying now, activists are being caged now, victimless crimes are destroying lives now, a little brown baby was most likely bombed while I was writing this article. Where does that leave me?

     

    I heard someone once say, "Freedom, by any means necessary."

     

    If that statement is true, then all practices that will help facilitate, develop, maintain and secure that freedom should be used. Derrick makes a salient point when he says that there are still other options.

     

    ...we can side-step them until they are irrelevant. Livestreaming video communications, Uber transportation worldwide, cryptographic currencies, smart-contracts built on blockchains, decentralized autonomous corporations... -Derrick J

     

    I agree. There are amazing advancements in not complying with the State and even those who are fighting with in it. I believe they will work and are working and that is the very reason we need to have the discussion that Cantwell is trying to have.

     

    Let's say we continue down the road we are going and more and more people "defect" and use alt-currencies, group together, (like the Free State Project, Blue Ridge Project, Free Island Project, etc.) grow their own food, and stop paying taxes until a paradigm shift takes place. The state will do what it always does when it's power is threatened: It will attack.

     

    We ignore that historical fact at our own peril. We stand atop new ground. Never has the world been so globalized. Never have the people of the world desired freedom as much as they do now. Never have we seen a time in history in which that shift is possible. I feel it. I hope you feel it. We're desperate for freedom, but the state is desperate to keep it from us.

     

    I have a simple suggestion. We do both. I'm not suggesting we start shooting cops. I'm not suggesting we sit idly by while the state grows in power. Let's build those communities. Let's grow crypto-currencies. Let sever any and all ties to the state that we can. Let's not forget that the state is violent, illogical and powerful and will do anything to remain powerful. We should always be, not only physically ready to defend, but mentally ready as well.

     

    Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable. -John F. Kennedy

     

    In the end, we are not the ones who will make it impossible.

     

    {extravote 1}