• Agenda 21 in China and the Technocratic Vision for Global Dictatorship

    The Echo of Antony Sutton

    Source: Stateless Homesteading

    This is Antony Sutton:

    220px-Antonysutton

    Antony Sutton, circa 1984

    In the not-too-distant past, Sutton was counted among the more respected historians in higher education, holding the title of research fellow at the esteemed Hoover Institute at Stanford University. Before being jettisoned from this coveted position by the Trilateral-affiliated dean, Sutton was (and remains) one of the most thorough academic researchers on the machinations of the Anglo-American Establishment to date. His work was so well-documented that, despite being antagonistic towards Sutton's worldview, even Rhodesian globalist Zbignew Brzezinski cited the accuracy of his research in his book, Between Two Ages.

     

     

    Of the erudite body of work produced by Antony Sutton, he remains best known for his books on banking, industrial, corporate, and military aid to Nazi Germany and the USSR by American companies. The most widely read of these volumes, Wall Street and the Rise of Hitlerand Wall Street and the Bolshevik Revolution, hold that a secret cabal of Anglo-American forces have been integral in the creation and support of every "East vs. West" dialectic of the past century. Quite a thesis, with a slew of primary documentation and the pedigree to back it up.

     

    Needless to say, Sutton had to go.

     

    His removal from the hallowed and controlled halls of Academia didn't stop him, though, as he continued to publish research on Deep Politics related to the Trilateral Commission and Skull and Bones, among other things. Unfortunately, as seems to be a tendency among great researchers speaking truth to power, Sutton passed too early back in 2002, and since, his investigation into the international Anglophile cabal has remained largely unadvanced.

     

    Until recently, there was no "Great Eastern Superpower" to warrant such research, as the bulk of occulted geopolitical study was focused instead on the "War on Terror" paradigm; in a post-2008 world in which the media, both alternative and otherwise, have readily forecast rise of the BRICS "anti-hegemon," (as they're called by some) this has all changed.

     

    James Corbett of The Corbett Report has recently taken up the mantle of Antony Sutton, challenging the open source research community to investigate potential ties between the Anglo-American Establishment and the growth of China as a world power in the 21st Century. In an attempt to rise to the occasion, this article seeks to help with the heavy lifting, and as the title indicates, will investigate this narrative through the lens of Agenda 21 in China.

     

    What I've managed to find thus far is fascinating, if not somewhat expected.

     

    "It is not generally recognized by outsiders that almost all the information gathered by any espionage net is nonsecret material fully available to anyone as public information." -Carroll Quigley, Tragedy and Hope, pg. 920

     

    Trilaterals Over Tianjin

     

    Tianjin is no normal Chinese city. Billed as a joint partnership between China and Singapore, Tianjin is one of the United Nations' flagship "Eco-Cities." In fact, it's no normal "Eco-City," either; the UN has a particular affinity for Tianjin, going so far as to hold its annual Climate Change Convention there in 2010. It's a textbook "green engineered" Smart City as called for in the 1992 Rio Conference on Sustainable Development, colloquially known as Agenda 21, and despite China erecting these "Smart Cities" en-masse in recent years, Tianjin remains one the country's only successful "sustainable" ventures.Tianjin: The future slums of Eco-Fascism

    Tianjin: The future slums of Eco-Fascism

    To what does Tianjin owe this seemingly unnatural success? Look no further than one of Agenda 21's hallmarks, the public private partnership, for the answer; as one would expect, Tianjin has quite the sordid (and fiscally endowed) cast of private financiers behind its advancement. Investment in Tianjin's "green infrastructure" alone is slated at over $6.5 billion USD as of 2015. Taking a glance at their "Partners" page, three entities stand out as particularly noteworthy (circled in red):

     

    General Motors, Mitsui Fudosan, and Samsung

    General Motors, Mitsui Fudosan Residential, and Samsung

     

    What do these three corporations have in common and how are the tentacles of Globalism operating through them to erect Tianjin as China's leading Smart City? One helped build the Nazi Empire. Two are members of the globalist Trilateral Commission. Another is among the infamous zaibatsu,established in the wake of the Meiji Restoration as the West's mercantile dog in Asia. All have historical ties to the "apex of [Western] industry," otherwise known as the "power elite."

     

    We first turn our glance, as Antony Sutton once did, towards General Motors.

     

    From Sustainable Wars to Sustainable Development

     

    NaziGM

     

    Yes, this actually happened.

     

    GM, as outlined in Wall Street and the Rise of Hitler, is no stranger to promoting internationalism at the expense not only of American interests, but human life in general. Particularly egregious was the support for the Nazi war machine by General Motors, spanning from as early as 1928 into the waning days of World War II in 1945. "Support," perhaps, does not belie the true extent of GM's value to the Third Reich, as they were an integral component within the American cabal secretly supporting Germany. Opel, Germany's largest tank supplier, was a wholly-owned subsidiary of General Motors and a seminal example of the early Military Industrial Complex. 1936 marked a profitable turning point for the enterprising Nazis at GM, as the Reich granted them tax-exempt status in order to expand factories for the upcoming war effort. Not exactly the "Arsenal of Democracy" you heard about on the History Channel, is it?

     

    Opel Tanks - 'Like A Rock'

     

    Opel Tanks - 'Like A Rock'

     

    Not to be caught undiversified and solely in the business of making tanks, GM maintained close ties with Standard Oil of New Jersey in a joint effort to fuel the Nazi military. From providing the components for synthetic oils and rubbers to supplying ethyl lead for engine maintenance, Rockefeller's Standard Oil and GM, via the I.G. Farben cartel, delivered the means and methods of keeping the resource-strapped, war-torn Germany on steady footing much longer than could have otherwise been sustained. America makes bombs, Germany makes bombs, GM makes a killing. Sutton says of this incestuous "apex" of American industry:

     

    "In brief, American companies associated with the Morgan-Rockefeller international investment bankers -- not, it should be noted, the vast bulk of independent American industrialists -- were intimately related to the growth of Nazi industry. It is important to note as we develop our story that General Motors, Ford, General Electric, DuPont and the handful of U.S. companies intimately involved with the development of Nazi Germany were -- except for the Ford Motor Company -- controlled by the Wall Street elite -- the J.P. Morgan firm, the Rockefeller Chase [National Bank] and to a lesser extent the Warburg Manhattan bank. This book is not an indictment of all American industry and finance. It is an indictment of the "apex" -- those firms controlled through the handful of financial houses, the Federal Reserve Bank system, the Bank for International Settlements, and their continuing international cooperative arrangements and cartels which attempt to control the course of world politics and economics."

     

    -Antony Sutton, Wall Street and the Rise of Hitler

     

    It should come as no shock to the attentive student of history that GM's documented affiliation with the Third Reich is more than indicative of their participation in the establishment of the digital, technocratic, global Fourth Reich represented by "Smart Cities" like Tianjin. Equally as indicative are the forces behindGeneral Motors, which, perhaps not coincidentally, are much the same today as they were 80 years ago. During the time period investigated in Wall Street and the Rise of Hitler, GM's largest shareholder was none other than JP Morgan, itself a front for Rothschild interests in America. In the wake of the 2008 "Great Recession," GM was effectively nationalized. One of its subsidiaries explicitly mentioned by Sutton as maintaining ownership of Opel, the General Motors Acceptance Corporation (GMAC), is now controlled by Cerberus Capital Management, owning a 51% stake.

    Cerberus: The three-headed beast, “powerful and without pity,” that guards the gates of Hell in Greek mythology. Fitting.

     

    Cerberus: The three-headed beast, “powerful and without pity,” that guards the gates of Hell in Greek mythology. Fitting.

     

    The international chairman of Cerberus is none other than Dan Quayle, former Vice President under George H.W. Bush, son of Nazi financier Prescott Bush. The same Prescott Bush, it's worth noting, who not only counted himself as a member of Skull and Bones, but also escaped prosecution at Nuremberg despite being identified as the owner of Fritz Thyssen's American shell company, Union Banking Corporation. Perhaps just for old time's sake, Cerberus appointed JP Morgan as its investment fund administrator back in 2011.

     

    ...but they promise they don't fund fascist empires anymore. Just sustainable cities and networked smart cars:

    ChevyTianjin

     

    Doubtlessly, the tank manufacturing assistance provided by the GM of 80 years ago seems far less innocuous than their "Smart Growth" projects of today, like the all-electric, self-driving Chevy EN-V 2.0. Superficially, the shift from military assistance to "green growth" could even be seen in a positive light. But is it? Does a driverless car, whose inherent aim is to limit human control of the machine, make anyone more free or autonomous themselves? Are cars constantly connected to the Internet, laden with microphones, sensors, and geolocation data a liberating technological development in a world where digital snitches in our pockets (smartphones) already run rampant?

     

    After all, the "public-private partnership" between organizations like Google, Microsoft, Apple, and the NSA have already proven these incestuous relationships to be a civil libertarian's worst nightmare. Will a similar relationship between the Chinese government and automotive manufacturers bring about the same results?

     

    From China Daily:

     

    Screenshot from 2015-06-20 13:59:47

     

    The title of China Daily's article requires a slight addendum, as upon further reading of the passage, "Government" deserves pluralization. Evidently, the Chinese Ministry of Environmental Protection requires the sage advice of the American EPA before proceeding in public-private ecstacy:

    DailyChinaEPA1

    Michael Walsh, EPA adviser, speaks before the China Vehicle Emission Control Policy Symposium in Beijing

     

    Michael Walsh, EPA adviser, speaks before the China Vehicle Emission Control Policy Symposium in Beijing

     

    Keeping one's head straight is a constant challenge in the 21st Century. Should I be terrified of China, as many mainstream and alternative news sources beggar of me, as the world is swept by a "New Cold War"? Should I scratch my head in confusion as American corporations, the Chinese government, the United Nations, and the EPA seem so tightly coordinated on pushing forth "sustainable development" despite being supposed "enemies"? Should I outsource my critical thinking and succumb to cognitive dissonance?

     

    Or was Antony Sutton onto something after all?

     

    The Sustainable Trilaterals

     

    Founded in 1973 by David Rockefeller and Zbignew Brzezinski to serve as a coalition of elites within finance and politics from Japan, Europe, and North America, the Trilateral Commission's ostensible purpose is to "foster closer cooperation among these core industrialized areas of the world with shared leadership responsibilities in the wider international system."

     

    The Trilateral Commission's logo - definitely NOT reminiscent of a Swastika

     

    The Trilateral Commission's logo - definitely NOT reminiscent of a Swastika

     

    In reality, the Trilateral Commission is yet another Neomercantile consolidation of political and economic power. Born with the destruction of the Bretton Woods System, Trilateralism attempted to fill the void left in the international monetary system by the lack of a gold trade standard with privately agreed upon trading blocks; in the age before NAFTA, the EU, and TPP, such coalitions between corporations and government were made largely via "Deep Political" actors like the Trilateral Commission (Bilderberg, the Council on Foreign Relations, and Chatham House are three other such Deep Political actors). Over the course of the late-70s and early-80s, Antony Sutton co-authored a series of papers entitled, Trilaterals Over Washington,but in lieu of recounting them here in their entirety, allow this establishment propaganda on the Trilateral Commission from the 1980s sitcom, Barney Miller, to enumerate the Commission's true intentions (masked as comedy, of course):

     

     

    Among the seeming prerequisites for admission to the Church of Globalism, in addition to alignment with the agenda satirically described above, is support of Agenda 21's sustainable development principles, and in this respect, the Trilateral Commission does not disappoint: Maxime Verhagen, Minister of Economic Affairs, Agriculture, and Innovation of the Netherlands, speaks before the Trilateral Commission

     

    Maxime Verhagen, Minister of Economic Affairs, Agriculture, and Innovation of the Netherlands, speaks before the Trilateral Commission in 2011

     

    Nor is such a declaration of "Green Revolution" an isolated incident. The Trilateral Commission maintains a well-sourced adherence to the global vision prescribed in Agenda 21. Trilateralism, since its inception, has had a specific affinity with Asia; originally tasked with merely assimilating Japan, the Commission has since added a number of Asian countries to its repertoire, most notably South Korea. Chinese Trilaterals are still vastly underrepresented, but the organization has taken great care in hand-selecting former diplomats, academics, and businessmen with Chinese experience, as their 2014 roster clearly demonstrates.

     

    Despite Chinese participation in Trilateralism being lax, the presence of Trilateral activity in China erecting Technocratic "Eco-Cities" is to be expected, especially given Trilateral member and Rockefeller "partner" Henry Kissinger's infamous experience in China:

     

    Kissinger's bio as it appears on the Trilateral Commission roster of April 2014

     

    Kissinger's bio as it appears on the Trilateral Commission roster of April 2014

     

    With or without Kissinger's numerous Chinese ventures, the Trilateral Commission has wasted no time installing its agents in "sustainably developing" Tianjin Eco-City. In fact, one of the Trilateral Commission's premier Asian members, Mitsui Fudosan Group of Japan, is a leading development partner in Tianjin's "green" efforts: Screenshot from 2015-06-17 14:14:23

    Mitsui's Trilateral history, as told by the Commission itself

     

    Mitsui's Trilateral history, as told by the Commission itself

     

    And as late as 2014, over 40 years since the Commission's founding, Mitsui still held prominent representation within Trilateralism by way of Takeshi Kunibe from Mitsui Banking and Shoei Utsuda, the Chairman of Mitsui's Board of Directors:

     

    TakeshiTrilateralKunibe-kun and Utsuda-kun as they appear in the Trilateral Commission roster for April 2014

     

    Kunibe-kun and Utsuda-kun as they appear in the Trilateral Commission roster for April 2014

     

    In typical Japanese corporatist fashion, the Eco-Technocracy of Tianjin was a domestic product before being exported to foreign markets. Japan, like much of the Western world, is awash with "sustainable development" projects, but one of its more notable Japanese efforts is Kashiwa-no-ha Smart City. As of June 2015, Kashiwa-no-ha is featured on the homepage of Mitsui Fudosan Group's English page. Upon examination of Kashiwa-no-ha's homepage, Mitsui seems to be, in large part, spearheading this project.

     

    Mitsui Fudosan's home page promoting its Smart City development

    Mitsui Fudosan's home page promotion for its Smart City development

     

    Mitsui is developing Kashiwa-no-ha in line with a true Technocratic vision: A model city in which pervasive, wirelessly-integrated sensors document, trace, track, and surveil every aspect of human life. This data, managed via an Orwellian Smart Center (read: Central Control) will "oversee energy operations, management, and control for the entire town." Constantly conglomerated and organized by central servers and algorithms, Smart Center's data on every aspect of the city is then served up on a silver platter for Academia, another element of Agenda 21's public-private partnerships. Kashiwa-no-ha's residents will be, quite literally, lab rats for the University research labs of Japan. Screenshot from 2015-06-17 14:22:44

     

    Will Mitsui bring to Tianjin the same tightly-controlled, technofeudal model it is developing in Kashiwa-no-ha? Given that Smart Cities the world over, from Masdar to Songdo, have adopted nearly identical models regardless of the "public" or "private" consortium of partners involved, future Chinese Eco-City residents shouldn't hold their breath. Speaking of Songdo (a Korean smart city), across the Sea of Japan lies another Trilateral-affiliated corporation listed as a partner in Tianjin Eco-City, Samsung. The South Korean company's experience in mobile phones and wireless technologies will doubtlessly come in handy when networking the slaves of Smart Cities the world over to Mother Brain, assets for which Samsung's President & COO, Lee Jae-yong, was likely selected for Trilateral membership:

    Lee Jea-yong's bio as it appears on the Trilateral Commission's 2014 roster

     

    Lee Jea-yong's bio as it appears on the Trilateral Commission's 2014 roster

     

    The Songdo International Business District's connect, scan, and surveil model, despite being located in Samsung's home country, was actually developed in partnership with Cisco, who also implemented Masdar City's wireless networking infrastructure. As noted earlier, however, the model from city to city remains nearly identical. Of Songdo, Smart Data Collective says:

     

    "Songdo will become a completely connected city, where almost any device, building or road will be equipped with wireless sensors or microchips. This will result in smart innovations such as streetlights that automatically adjust to the number of people out on the street. All houses in Songdo will be equipped with sensors, also known as domotica, which can be managed via a large TV in the living room of each residency. Next to the homes, these TelePresence screens will be available in all offices, hospitals, schools and shopping centres. The City of Songdo is a futuristic city, completely ready in 2015." via Smart Data Collective

     

    With Songdo's "Internet of Things" niche already filled by Cisco, one might assume that participation by Samsung in Songdo would be redundant. Fortunately for Samsung, it turns out to be a far more versatile company than the average smartphone-toting, LCD-watching American is privy to, as in 2011, Samsung's pharmaceutical division, Samsung Biologics, broke ground on its newest manufacturing facility in Songdo:

     

    Samsung Biologics moves to Songdo, via pharmaceutical-technology.com

     

    Samsung Biologics moves to Songdo, via pharmaceutical-technology.com

     

    A savvy investment for Samsung, surely, as the free medical data mined from Songdo's unwitting populous will be quite handy in manufacturing new alopathic drugs, likely to be sold directly back to the captive and heavily surveiled market that is Songdo.

     

    Sustainability or Bust

     

    Tianjin in China, Songdo in Korea, Kashiwa-no-ha in Japan; Asia is certainly "all in" on sustainability, and given that the development of modern Asian urban centers (pervasive wireless connectivity, electric-powered transit, high density construction, pedestrian-centric urban planning, etc.) are already in line with many "sustainable development" principles, the East is an ideal target for marketing Agenda 21's Smart Cities. Japan in particular is facing a widely publicized demographic crisis, a symptom of which has been the creeping diminishment of rural (mainly farming) villages and towns, another stated aim of the guidelines put forth by the Rio Earth Summit in 1992. The Hegelian crisis of "climate change," the Globalist's deus ex machinaintended to unify mankind against an eternal Straussian enemy, has also been stressed to Eastern populations. Collectivize under the auspices of Eco-Technocracy or face another Fukushimais the implication put forth not only to Japan, but all countries affected by the numerous fault lines in the vicinity of the Sea of Japan. SmartEcoCity, a sustainable development project based out of China, intimates as much in an article published in March of 2014:

    .

     

    Screenshot from 2015-06-17 15:12:23

     

    This orchestrated propaganda campaign aimed at herding rural Korean and Japanese people into Smart Cities goes beyond isolated blog posts by sustainable development firms in China. Korean media is also in full swing propagating the meme that Smart Cities are the perfect escape for victims ravaged by "climate change." In the wake of Fukushima, Yonhap News of Korea published a human interest piece about Japanese citizens displaced in the crisis relocating to none other than Songdo, South Korea.

     

    Problem? "Climate change" is destroying human life and infrastructure throughout the world. Reaction? Devastation, as for the survivors of Fukushima who now find themselves homeless and unemployed. Solution? Be willingly stacked-and-packed in your local Smart City, of course, before such a fate befalls you as well! Truly a Hegelian masterpiece.

     

    No less masterful is mainland China's orchestrated campaign to advertise "Smart Growth," though by a somewhat different tactic: Heavy-handed bureaucracy and overt threats of fines, closure of business, or imprisonment if emission guidelines are not adhered to.

    Screenshot from 2015-06-20 15:13:05

    Screenshot from 2015-06-20 15:18:09

    A recent article from China Daily reporting that "administrative detention" (read: imprisonment) will be exercised for not abiding by sustainable development

     

    A recent article from China Daily reporting that "administrative detention" (read: imprisonment) will be exercised for not abiding by sustainable development

     

    China's "public" expression of the "public-private partnership" paradigm enshrined by Agenda 21 is perfectly in line with its development as a mixed totalitarian/capitalistic state, expressed most recently by new mandates ranking "civic compliance" through social media usage. Civic compliance ratings that will, as planned by Smart Cities, eventually include individual's "eco-friendliness." Between the strict control of China's dictatorial ruling class, American automotive engineering know-how, and the globalized neofeudal model of the Trilateral Commission working in perfect harmony, Chinese Smart Cities like Tianjin have a bright future. Just make sure that light's an LED powered solely by wind, or you may have to be recycled, Comrade.

     

    Conclusions

     

    Sutton's research in the Wall Street series revolved centrally around technological and financial transfers from West to East during World War II and throughout the Cold War to America's supposed enemies. In examining three examples of Anglo-American Establishment corporations implementing Agenda 21 in China, we find these same two elements that Sutton identified in Wall Streetat work in the "public-private partnership" that comprises Tianjin Eco-City: Significant Anglo-American corporations providing technological and financial assistance towards Chinese "Smart Growth" projects. While the wholesale export of American military ingenuity Eastward described by Sutton is beyond the purview of this article, the links that have been enumerated upon here are no less insidious. As informed individuals are privy to, Agenda 21 and the "Eco Tech" movement surrounding it are, Agenda 21 researcher Rosa Korie states, merely a green mask. Behind the mask lies the vision of Brzeiznski, of Huxley, Orwell, and of comptrollers throughout the ages: Nothing short of a society under complete and constant surveillance by governments, academics, and corporations to be managed by a class of "technotronic elites":

     

    "The technotronic era involves the gradual appearance of a more controlled society. Such a society would be dominated by an elite, unrestrained by traditional values. Soon it will be possible to assert almost continuous surveillance over every citizen and maintain up-to-date complete files containing even the most personal information about the citizen. These files will be subject to instantaneous retrieval by the authorities."

     

    -Zbignew Brzezinski, Between Two Ages

     

    The Gestapo attempted to construct the very panopticon described by Brzezinski above; a society greeted by the constant creedo of, "Papers, please," as German citizens shuffled through the streets unaware whether the man next to him should be treated with camaraderie or suspicion. The failure of this goal throughout the 30s and 40s was not for lack of trying, but a simple matter of timing. The technological, automated surveillance of the 21st Century that could make such a society feasible simply did not exist yet. It cannot be said, however, that the Third Reich's efforts were not forward-thinking in this respect, as none other than IBM was contracted to manage the records of citizens slated for "extermination" by the German government. While IBM Analytics didn't exist 80 years ago, their algorithms now in existence, designed to mirror the Pre-Crime of dystopian science fiction of films like likeMinority Report,certainly would have come in handy for Nazi futurists of the era:

     

     

    For Berlin to develop into a "Smart City" capable of such goals would have required nearly a century of thumb-twiddling to bide the time necessary for the technology capable of enabling it to manifest, but for opportunistic leaders of today, no such time need be wasted. One could simply follow the lead of Smart Cities around the globe and install IBM Analytics' citizen management software:

     

    Zhenjiang, China - another Smart City - welcomes IBM Analytics

     

    Zhenjiang, China - another Smart City - welcomes IBM Analytics

     

    Smart Growth in line with Agenda 21's Anglo-American vision is not limited to China or any other geographic region, for that matter; its global spread knows no ethnic or political bounds. Regardless of seeming Western antagonism towards, for example, the BRICS nations, sustainable development principles have been adopted by BRICS at an unprecedented pace. The United Nation's Conference on Trade and Development held late last year published a document entitled, "A BRICS Development Bank: A Dream Coming True?" describing succinctly the UN's desire for the BRICS "New Development Bank" to fund sustainable development projects like Smart Cities. As cited in the publication itself (as well as the examples in the article herein), the BRICS NDB has wasted no time getting in lock-step with their UN, IMF, World Bank, and BIS partners' vision for a "sustainable" world.

     

    These same BRICS countries, many alt-media prognosticators proclaim, are tirelessly working towards supplanting the Anglo-American Establishment in geopolitics and finance. If this is truly the case, the BRICS "anti-hegemon" are either so tactically incompetent as to allow the Trilateral Commission and the computers, algorithms, and sensors of their Globalist affiliates to build their infrastructure, or the BRICS are not nearly as opposed to Global Serfdom as most would have you believe. The evidence suggests the latter to be infinitely more likely than the former.

     

    The development of China's Smart Cities is not overtly warfaric, but their veneer should not dissuade one from realizing the chilling nature of their Anglo-American funded presence. Agenda 21's sustainable development goals are nothing short of an Act of War; not of tanks, bombs, or maimed limbs. Not between clashing superstates, as in wars of the past, but between populations and their own governments.

     

    This challenge is not new or unique to our generation, but its current form and implementation are. Secret police replaced by sensors. Judge and jury supplanted by algorithm. Phone taps replaced with Orwellian "Smart TVs" (Telescreens) and Internet surveillance. Smart Meters to regulate every aspect of human dwellings. Smartphones to track your every movement. Self-driving cars to limit or restrict human mobility. Biotech and pharmaceuticals to regulate the spontaneity inherent in human thoughts and emotions.

     

    The challenge lies in recognizing this glittering Technocratic vision for what it is: Global dictatorship.

     

    Blogging under the pseudonym of Rusticus, the author and freedom activist operates a website tracing the machinations of the Anglo-American Establishment throughout history while simultaneously documenting the process of creating a truly off-grid homestead. (www.statelesshomesteading.com)

     

    {extravote 1}

     

  • Ben Swann Speech & Interview @ The Liberty Summit

    Ben Swann discusses Fascism, Bitcoin, Jury Nullification and working together. Followed by an interview with him.

    Ben Swann

    Campgain for Liberty

     

     

  • Glen Chancy on Red Light Cameras

    We had the pleasure of sitting down with Glen Chancy, the Apopka FL Mayor Hopeful and talking to him about his activism and upcoming Mayorial election.

     

    Glen co-founded banthecams.org in 2009 with Henry Bentley and several other concerned citizens. The economic crisis had hit the year before, and suddenly cash-strapped local governments had begun putting up Redlight Cameras, not only in Apopka but in other Central Florida communities.

     

    Alarmed by the sudden rise in this kind of unconsitutional law enforcement, Glen and Henry launched banthecams.org to bring together like-minded citizens to stop what was clearly an abusive and unjust method of earning revenue for the city’s coffers. Ban The Cams quickly became a rallying point for a diverse coalition of activists looking to combat this injustice.

     

     

     

  • Glenn "Kane" Jacobs: Selling Liberty and Interview

    A speech in Orlando for the Orange County Campaign for Liberty chapter on 2/1/14 by Glenn "Kane" Jacobs titled; "We Gotta Market Liberty: Stop Educating, Stop Debating, and Start Selling Liberty"

     

     

    We had some time to ask Glenn some questions about selling liberty, education and the trivium

     

  • Interview with Patriot Gardens, Food Freedom, Property Rights

    Jason and Jennifer Helvenston of Patriot Gardens talk with Robert about their struggle and triumph over intrusive government. They have plans to help you do the same and teach you to be self sufficient.

     

    Patriot Gardens

    Patriot Gardens Facebook

    Also check out the Food Freedom Initiative

     

    {extravote 1}

  • Is Journalistic Integrity and Truth in Media Rising?



    R.I.P.-Journalism

    A new trend of truth in media has occurred. Mainstream journalists are beginning to take individual responsibility for what comes out of their mouths, as another string of journalists have quit for being unwilling to whitewash the truth, given their network's interests and overall agenda. I hear the echoes of Ben Swann, leaving his local Fox affiliate in Cincinnati, OH to pursue his own goals in journalism, and Amber Lyon who left CNN after she uncovered that CNN received direct funds from the Bahrain Economic Development Board as well as other governments such as Saudi Arabia to paint their countries in a good light. Both have gone on to start their own companies and use their journalistic capabilities to expose truth.

     

    The recent activities within news corporations and governments have led others to reach for their own journalistic integrity by leaving their jobs. Liz Wahlof RT America and investigative journalist for CBS, Sharyl Attkisson.

     

    Liz Wahl at RT America, who caught national media attention by resigning after a show recently saying she "could not be part of a network funded by the Russian government that whitewashes the actions of Putin." Hinting at the recent events of Russia and other country's intervention in Ukraine's turmoil over whether or not to join the EU. One could argue that successful journalists and news anchors have been encouraged to leave major networks by seeing many others that have done the same before them, for the same reasons.

     

     

     

    The most recent has been Sharyl Attkisson, an investigative journalist who has worked for CBS for the past two decades uncovering aspects of the Benghazi scandal and the Fast & Furious operation. She resigned citing a liberal bias, influence of network sponsors and partners, and lack of support for her work as reasons for leaving. Subsequently, she was growing frustrated with the obstacles involved with reporting on and the overall transparency of the Obama administration, that has led to her working on a book titled "Stonewalled: One Reporter's Fight for Truth in Obama's Washington".

     

    There was another voice that was heard the past weeks, that of Abby Martin, who hosts her own show on RT America, Breaking the Set. Why did Abby Martin not resign, does she have no journalistic integrity??? Hardly, and in fact is far from the truth. Abby was actually the first to speak out on the state military intervention in Ukraine. However, on Breaking The Set, Abby has a little thing called editorial independence.

     

     

     

    Editorial independence is the freedom of editors to make decisions without interference from the owners of a publication. Editorial independence is tested, for instance, if a newspaper runs articles that may be unpopular with its advertising clientele or this case, speaking out against the actions of a government that "signs your paycheck". Regular news reporters do not usually have this luxury. My suggestion to anyone working within a news corporation of any kind, make sure it's in your contract.

     

    Whether working for a huge corporation, a small independent publication, or for yourself, my thought is that a journalist must always be an advocate of truth. Many have lost that along the way as a consolidation of power by the bottom of the funnel of corporations has grown larger and larger over the past few decades. This has done many hurtful things to the economy, domestic and foreign relations, food and water supply, and environment. It has made it damn near impossible to shine the light on truth if one is working within these corporations, or have a controlled narrative handed down by these corporations and governments.

     

    So, journalist or not, I hope we can all find what we're looking for, which is truth. Through the articles, documents, and videos individuals share with each other daily, we are getting closer and closer to truth without the whitewashing, teat sucking, ball washing corporate news media that hands down government propaganda to us daily. We have found a new way, this which we call "new media" to cover the cares and concerns about what individuals deem important, not what we are told is important. The realization that even in media:

     

    "In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act". - George Orwell

     

    {extravote 1}

     

  • Lego Movie Review: Not just for statists

    Lego Movie

    Not too long ago, my co-host and friend, Matthew Dalton, suggested I take my kids to go see Lego movie. He told me that it was "anarchist propaganda" and my God, was it ever. I must warn you, I am about dissect and analyze all of the fun out of this movie (my editor says I'm supposed to type *Spoiler Alert* here) and I will not feel sorry about it. The movie begins when a wizard, Vitruvius, attempts to protect the "Kragle," a super weapon, from the evil President Business (an obvious poke at both government and cronyism,) who wants to use it to freeze the universe as it has been built by him. Vitruvius fails to stop him, but warns Lord Business of a prophecy where a person called the "Special" will find the Piece (Peace?) of Resistance capable of stopping the Kragle. I identified the typical tropes in a children's movie. You know, like, slapstick, references and parodies of known characters, The Chosen one, ect. ect. I was then introduced to the main character, Emmet Brickowski, an ordinary construction worker, and was given a not-so-subtle message about how it is necessary to conform and have blind acceptance of instruction to be happy.



    The part that made me say to myself, "The most staunch indictment of the culture of control that is pushed in Mainstream Media/Politics today is when the main character literally forgets his clothes without instruction to remind him." You might be familiar with that argument. "Without the law, how will people know how to be civil?" When in reality they are saying, "People are too stupid to regulate themselves and, apparently, will forget to dress in the morning."

     

    "Are not laws dangerous which inhibit the passions? Compare the centuries of anarchy with those of the strongest legalism in any country you like and you will see that it is only when the laws are silent that the greatest actions appear." -Marquis de Sade

     

    Following that scene, I was magically taken back to a time in my life when "fitting in" was important.

     

     

     

    Do you remember that time in your life? When you were easily influenced by the trends of society either through pop culture, politics, or your parents? The amount of time spent in that state of unaware malleability differs per individual because of environment, genetics and willpower. Emmet feels a very real need to be both a part of something bigger than himself and to stand out and be noticed. It is a paradox that all humans share. In his desire to be noticed, he did everything he was told to do, simply so that he might be considered be a part of something bigger. As most of us know, now that we are older, when you judge your own importance by the standards of others you will always eventually fail.

     

    "The roots of the word 'anarchy' are 'an archos,' 'no leaders,' which is not really about the kind of chaos that most people imagine when the word 'anarchy' is mentioned. I think that anarchy is, to the contrary, about taking personal responsibility for yourself." -Alan Moore

     

    After being shown that Emmet is so absolutely and entirely normal that he isn't even noticed by his peers, He comes across a woman, Wyldstyle, who is searching for something after hours at Emmet's construction site. When he investigates, Emmet falls into a hole and finds the Piece of Resistance. Compelled to touch it, Emmet experiences vivid visions and passes out. He awakens elsewhere with the Piece of Resistance attached to his back in the custody of Bad Cop, Lord Business' lieutenant, whose alter-ego is, of course, Good Cop. Let's stop here to introduce you to Good Cop/Bad Cop:

     

    “Power changes everything till it is difficult to say who are the heroes and who the villains.” ― Libba Bray, The Sweet Far Thing

     

    Bad Cop has a good side which still holds some influence over Bad Cop. Eventually, Good Cop is erased by President Business, which is a clear indictment of the police force today. If you work for an evil regime and never question orders, no matter how good a person you are on the inside, you will eventually have all that is good about you erased... but I digress. There, Emmet learns of Business' plans to freeze the world with the Kragle. Wyldstyle rescues Emmet and takes him to Vitruvius, who explains that he and Wyldstyle are "Master Builders" capable of building anything they need, both with great speed and without instruction manuals; when Lord Business rose to power, his disapproval of such anarchic creativity resulted in him capturing many of them.

     

    "Following the Inquisition's injunction against Galileo, the papal Master of the Sacred Palace ordered that Foscarini's Letter be banned, and Copernicus' De revolutionibus suspended until corrected. The papal Congregation of the Index preferred a stricter prohibition, and so with the Pope's approval, on March 5 the Congregation banned all books advocating the Copernican system, which it called "the false Pythagorean doctrine, altogether contrary to Holy Scripture.""

     

    As the "Special," Emmet is destined to defeat him, yet Wyldstyle and Vitruvius are disappointed to find Emmet displays no creativity. Now some of you are already aware of the "reluctant hero" trope. As a matter of fact, Ron Paul would be an excellent real-world parallel of this phenomenon. How many times have you heard, "I like Ron Paul except for...." Wyldstyle and Vitruvius take Emmet to an underground resistance where there is no instructions or rules. He obviously doesn't understand how a society can exists without rules.



    It is here where Emmet tries to take on the role of the Special and gives a very honest speech, causing the Master Builders to doubt him and his ability to change the world.

     

    "I have no experience fighting, leading or making plans. It's going to be really hard, but I..." -Emmet

     

    Soon, the Cops find the underground resistance and Emmet and his friends must run and hide. We are then treated to this wonderfully anarchic scene.



    First, we see many different people working together, yet separately, to achieve a common goal, and when Emmet asks to be told what to do, he is told not to worry about what the others are doing and do what is special to him. Jumping ahead in the story, Emmet is eventually told by Vitruvius that the Prophecy of the Special is made up and there is no such thing as the Special. It is when Emmet accepts this truth, that he is just one person whose ideas are not better or worse than anyone else, that he steps up to being a hero. That is the heart of Anarchism/Voluntaryism. No one is greater or worse than you. There are no bad ideas, just bad actions. No one should rule you or make you follow instruction just because they feel you should. I could go on and on about the parallels that were drawn in this movie to Anarchism and Voluntaryism, but I will let Emmet close this article for me.

     

    "You don't have to be the bad guy. You are the most talented, most interesting, and most extraordinary person in the universe. And you are capable of amazing things. Because you are the Special. And so am I. And so is everyone. The prophecy is made up, but it's also true. It's about all of us. Right now, it's about you. And you... still... can change everything." -Emmet

     

    {extravote 1}

     

  • Mind the Control Podcast #1: American Cowboys

     

    Listen to Stitcher

    “The American people don’t read.”-Allen Dulles, Director of Central Intelligence

    Perhaps the most infamous of all American “intelligence” agencies, the CIA (or The Company, as they so often refer to themselves) is an agency mired in controversy, blood, and conspiracy. On this inaugural episode of Mind the Control, we present a thorough primer on CIA, its origins, history, and activities in the present day. What can the founding of The Company tell us about its purpose and function? Who does the agency work for, exactly?

     

    Shownotes

    0:00:12 – Hand On Your Gun by Lowkey
    0:00:48 – Michael Ruppert Confronts CIA Director John Deutch
    0:01:58 – Russia Today’s Abby Martin on Iran Contra and the CIA Cocaine/Heroin Conspiracy
    0:07:26 – Michael Ruppert’s Truth and Lies of 9/11 lecture
    0:32:20 – Introduction Monologue
    0:37:03 – The Origins of US Intelligence lecture by Dave Emory
    2:35:51 – The Last CIA Whistleblower, an interview with John Stockwell
    3:20:11 – Al Qaeda Doesn’t Exist Part 2, a documentary by James Corbet of The Corbett Report
    3:28:37 – Dr. Colin Ross on CIA Mind Control Programs
    3:41:03 – CIA and Drug Running lecture by Michael Ruppert
    4:48:03 – The Boston Bombing, the CIA, and the US Empire with Sibel Edmonds and Lew Rockwell

     

    {extravote 1}

     

  • Robert's Porcfest XI Speech "Torch of the Trivium"

    Robert uses Plato's Allegory of the Cave to explain the Trivium method of critical thinking at the Porcupine Freedom Festival XI.

    Trivium Education

    Free State Project

    Porcfest

     

    {extravote 1}

  • Support

    SUPPORT JREV

    "The conscious and intelligent manipulation of the organized habits and opinions of the masses is an important element in democratic society. Those who manipulate this unseen mechanism of society constitute an invisible government which is the true ruling power of our country." -Edward Bernays, Propaganda

    Do you find that quote gut-wrenching? So do we. Here at the Journalistic Revolution, we’ve got some pretty monolithic competition: Corporate propaganda, State propaganda, foundation-funded propaganda, and at times, the struggle over the “organized habits and opinions of the masses” seems to be an unwinnable cause. Nevertheless, we do what we do out of sheer passion, and will do so for free so long as we live.


    But we’re only human. Web, audio, and radio stream hosting is expensive. Travel to shoot interviews and documentaries with fascinating people costs just as much, and a venerable fleet of cameras and microphones to accompany such a shoot are also pricey. While we’re more than happy and willing to provide these services at our own expense, we would greatly appreciate the help of you, our audience, in making the Journalistic Revolution a valued member of the budding alternative media.


    Any monetary donation within your means to help accomplish that goal would be greatly appreciated!

    Donate via PayPal:


    Donate via BitCoin:




    Donate via LiteCoin:

  • The Counter Economic Markets of North Korea

    North Korea

    The Democratic Peoples Republic of Korea is a criminal regime built on propaganda and fear. A reflection of what George Orwell saw in the Soviet Union when he wrote 1984.

     

    The Democratic Peoples Republic of Korea is a brutal regime that is swift and efficient in silencing dissent. The country has also been in the cross-hairs of the United States and other Western countries for quite some time now. To understand the current problems facing the country one must look at North Korea’s history, and what led to rise of such a tyrannical regime.

     

    The story of the modern state of North Korea starts shortly after the second world war. The previous Japanese occupation had ended, and the country was split into two regions. With the Soviet forces taking the north while United States forces took the south.

     

    It wasn’t until 1948 that the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea was established with Kim Il Sung installed by the Soviets as the ruler. It was at this time Soviet troops withdrew from the many areas of the North.

     

    The United States did not approve of this new regime. Aside from Kim being a brutal dictator his policies did not favor the western corporate interest. So they began to fund groups in the south that favored U.S. policies and opposed Soviet. Eventually in 1950 thesouth declared themselves independent from the north. Thus starting the Korean War.

     

    The war lasted three years with the United States providing military support to the South. The Soviets provided much aid and the air support to the north, but did not provide troops like the United States, eventually a cease-fire was agreed upon by both sides. The ceasefire has lasted until this day.

     

    In 1994, the long-time ruler of the DPRK Kim Il Sung passed away. Leaving his kingdom to his son Kim Jong Il.

     

    The years to follow would bring great suffering and great hardship for the region. Severe flooding in the country lead to famine leaving many starving. Leading to the deaths of over three million.

     

    During this time, the Kim regime was terrified of the people rebelling. So the regime became even more brutal and efficient with shutting down revolutionary talk very quickly.Videos smuggled out of the DPRK show public executions of those who opposed the Kim regime.

     

    Kim Jung Il’s reign lasted until 2011 when he died. Almost immediately afterward his son Kim Jung Un was named the “great successor”.

     

    Throughout the years, the United States has been looking for a way to take out the Kim regime, and install a ruler that would best fit U.S. interests. While North Korea has struggled to maintain such a brutal state.

     

    The border between the north, and south is very heavily guarded on both sides. So many attempts to escape the regime through China. The problem with this is that if they are caught in China they are sent back to North Korea to face the same fate as that of Winston Smith in 1984. So where does this leave the people? What hope do they have to be trapped between the iron fist of two powers? The answers are quite surprising and has been there since the dawn of recorded history. It is only thanks to this new digital age that we are able to see it in action.

     

    The modern age has allowed light to be shined onto the once hermit kingdom. Black markets have allowed for videos from the lives of those inside the regime to make their way out. As well as allowing foreign videos and goods to make their way into the country. The Kim regime isn’t stupid, they know that these black markets pose a serious threat to their power. However, they also know that they cannot wipe out these smaller markets entirely. This is why the regime tolerates small markets but selling for personal gain is still illegal.

     

    The United States also realizes that that the Korean people partaking in these counter-economics is a threat to their interests. The black markets could actually provide the real change that North Korea needs. Engaging in counter-economics provides elements of free trade that would greatly benefit the people of the north but would threaten foreign corporations. This is why the U.S. will take whatever excuse they can to further sanction the north. These more strict sanctions will not only hurt the current rulers of the DPRK, but it will also hurt those who engage in black market activity. Eliminate those who oppose you, even if they show potential for real change, and support those who will work in your interest.

     

    Engaging in the counter-economics of the black market has always led to the end of tyrannical regimes. In his work, An Agorist Primer, political philosopher Samuel Edward Konkin III cites several examples of how counter-economics have brought authoritarian entities to their knees. Most notably though Konkin shows how counter-economics brought the Soviet Union to its knees. If we look at the DPRK today we can see the same black market forces choking the Kim regime. People smuggling flash drives into the country full of western media for people to sell, illegal radio broadcasts put out by those who have defected from the state, jumping the border to get money to China to bring back to North Korea, all are fine examples of counter-economics that are choking the regime. For if there is any true hope for the people of the DPRK it lies in the black market.

     

    {extravote 1}

     

  • Violent Revolution Or Peaceful Evolution?



    Violent Revolution or Peaceful Evolution

    Are we spearheading a peaceful evolution or delaying a violent revolution? I have recently had my worldview shaken by an article written by Christopher Cantwell called, "Violently Overthrow The Government." The reason for said shaking is because it scared me to my very core; not because I am scared of a violent revolution. If that must take place, then so be it. It scared me because I have put all my faith and work into the belief of a peaceful evolution. Chris destroyed it in a single  article, albeit a long one, with logic and within the boundaries of the Non-Aggression Principle.

     

    First let me say that I, in no way, support the killing of anyone, even if they wear a funny costume and shiny badges. I judge individuals on their own actions and won't blame one costumed man for the actions of another. I want with the deepest of my being for every one of my fellow human beings to wake up tomorrow and be free along with me. I base my life around education and truth with the intention of helping others to think for themselves.

     

    That being said, I also fully support, believe in, promote, and have a basic human right to self defense. If someone tries to kidnap, steal from, or attack me, I have the right to defend myself and my property. If necessary, I can kill my aggressor. I would feel sad for the loved ones survived by said attacker, but have no remorse for the attacker himself.

     

    Now that I have set a standard of my thinking, let's get into the article.

     

    Chris first shows the logical and factual failings of democracy, civil disobedience, education and peaceful parenting. These are not new ideas, not new practices and history shows that the State, in the end, will prevail. So, where does that leave us?

     

    My proposal, and in all honesty, I’m still working out the details, has been to resort to force. For free men and women to forcefully defend themselves against agents of the State. To kill government agents who would otherwise use force against them, until their jobs simply become so dangerous that they seek other lines of work. -Cantwell

     

    He isn't calling for a violent "revolution" per se, but for already free men and women to defend themselves against already established aggressors.  He isn't purposing that we organize together and insert new leaders and elected officials. Just defend yourself and, if you are a moral man/woman, your neighbors and fellow humans.

     

    No, the goal of overthrow must be to put an end to the State, not shuffle the deck. -Cantwell

     

    Honestly, I can understand and even agree with that reasoning. It is both logical and moral. If he was asking for us to just start killing agents of the state at random, then I could not support his stance. He isn't asking that; only that you defend yourself when they aggress against you. My nagging question, even though I may agree to a point, is, "Are the state of affairs bad enough to warrant such actions and if they are, how do you achieve this without just being some uprising that was quickly quelled?"

     

    The most attractive part of force, is that it requires the fewest participants...... Let us assume that the average cop writes 10 traffic tickets per day. If 5% of the population of a given geographic area simply understood that force was necessary and proper, a police officer would be coming into contact with one of those people roughly every other day. Up that number to 10%, or be in a place where police write more than 10 tickets a day, and the likelihood of such an encounter becomes much greater. -Cantwell

     

    In the last paragraph of the article I see, what I believe, to be Cantwell's true intentions of writing this gut wrenching and paradigm shaking article.

     

    Those who have attempted to avoid this discussion, such as Stefan Molyneux, and the Free State Project, do so at the peril of their own credibility, and do a disservice to those who they would claim to be trying to help. This discussion is happening with or without you, and if you really think I’m that far off base, then the proper way to handle that is to make a coherent response. Shutting down the lines of communication only proves that you don’t have one. -Cantwell

     

    Aha! Seriously though. Why isn't this a discussion? Is it so unbelievable that sometime in the future retaliation against the State will be necessary?

     

    Luckily, someone I respect answered the call of violent revolution or peaceful evolution. Derrick J Freeman! I was excited. He even titled it Chris Cantwell is All Wrong. I was going to have my faith in peaceful resistance restored because I was, unfortunately, unable to destroy Cantwell's logic. I was hopeful.

     

    What it comes down to is a war of ideas. If all the world’s a stage, and we all the players, then let us demonstrate for the world what a free society can look like. Let us provide the example and be the light on the hill. Let us provide alternatives to the things the state provides, like food and care for the old and needy. -Derrick J

     

    Yes!!

     

    The people have to be won, they have to be sold on the idea. -Derrick J

     

    YES!!!

     

    And listen, you’re picking the wrong battle. You’re outmatched. There will never be a successful violent revolt in America; it will be squashed. No, like the Cyclops in the Odyssey, free humanity must outwit the sociopaths to defeat them. -Derrick J

     

    BOOM! Come at me Bro!

     

    There’s nothing special about you or this time. You aren’t owed freedom in your lifetime, but you can have it....If your self-interest is personal freedom, then live free and take the consequences.... -Derrick J

     

    Halleluj.... wait...

     

    I am a free and unique human being, that makes me special. That's why killing is wrong. Everyone is special. And in the truest sense of time, "now" is the most important time. You're right about not being "owed" freedom because it is already mine, but that won't stop a Cop/FBI/Military from killing me if they so wish.

     

    Live free and take the consequences? I could agree with that IF one were talking about the consequences of not saving enough money or seeding my fields too late in the season, but I should "take" being beaten by costumed criminals for smoking a flower?

     

    Derrick's article left me wanting. He made some substantive points, but didn't address the issue that people are dying now, activists are being caged now, victimless crimes are destroying lives now, a little brown baby was most likely bombed while I was writing this article. Where does that leave me?

     

    I heard someone once say, "Freedom, by any means necessary."

     

    If that statement is true, then all practices that will help facilitate, develop, maintain and secure that freedom should be used. Derrick makes a salient point when he says that there are still other options.

     

    ...we can side-step them until they are irrelevant. Livestreaming video communications, Uber transportation worldwide, cryptographic currencies, smart-contracts built on blockchains, decentralized autonomous corporations... -Derrick J

     

    I agree. There are amazing advancements in not complying with the State and even those who are fighting with in it. I believe they will work and are working and that is the very reason we need to have the discussion that Cantwell is trying to have.

     

    Let's say we continue down the road we are going and more and more people "defect" and use alt-currencies, group together, (like the Free State Project, Blue Ridge Project, Free Island Project, etc.) grow their own food, and stop paying taxes until a paradigm shift takes place. The state will do what it always does when it's power is threatened: It will attack.

     

    We ignore that historical fact at our own peril. We stand atop new ground. Never has the world been so globalized. Never have the people of the world desired freedom as much as they do now. Never have we seen a time in history in which that shift is possible. I feel it. I hope you feel it. We're desperate for freedom, but the state is desperate to keep it from us.

     

    I have a simple suggestion. We do both. I'm not suggesting we start shooting cops. I'm not suggesting we sit idly by while the state grows in power. Let's build those communities. Let's grow crypto-currencies. Let sever any and all ties to the state that we can. Let's not forget that the state is violent, illogical and powerful and will do anything to remain powerful. We should always be, not only physically ready to defend, but mentally ready as well.

     

    Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable. -John F. Kennedy

     

    In the end, we are not the ones who will make it impossible.

     

    {extravote 1}

     

  • We are all Hypocrites




    We are all hypocrites. I hear a lot of people say this, but I don’t think that they really know what it means. I first realized that I was a hypocrite when I was 21. I worked with a Drug Awareness group in Florida. The point of the group was to educate people on how to safely do drugs, as to cut down on “overdoses”, but I almost never followed the caution that I was promoting. It all went downhill from there.

     

    Let me walk you through my line of thinking. According to the oldest definitions of the word hypocrisy,

     

    Hypocrisy (n.)

    c. 1200, ipocrisie, "the sin of pretending to virtue or goodness," from Old French ypocrisie, from Late Latin hypocrisis "hypocrisy," also "an imitation of a person's speech and gestures," from Attic Greek hypokrisis "acting on the stage; pretense," metaphorically.

     

    When I was a part of the Drug Awareness Group, I preached caution and moderation, but that was just an act, an imitation, a pretending of virtue. I never followed it myself. I didn’t even believe the message I was purporting. I pushed the limits and did so in excess.

     

    Politicians are a perfect example of this. President Obama was highly critical of George Bush’s use of Executive Orders, but is about to reach the same number of orders given.

     

    George W. Bush 291

     

    Barack Obama 234

     

    He pretended, imitated, and acted as if this was a travesty, but in the end, did not hold himself to the same accountability.

     

    Actors do it. They rally against guns then star in movies that promote the use of guns as heroic. Protesters want free speech, until someone disagrees with them. Religious leaders talk of poverty and humbleness until it’s time to buy a house or car.

     

    Every single person is a hypocrite. I’m not saying that you have to be perfect. Purism is a lie, as much as the lies that hypocrites tell themselves. The goal is to remove as much hypocrisy as possible in one’s life. The secret to doing so, is to stop lying to yourself. Are you selfish? Then be selfish. Embrace yourself.

     

    If you embrace yourself and find something you don’t like then, and only then, can you change it. If you continue to justify or rationalize your behavior then you will make change much harder on yourself. Eventually, this cognitive dissonance will lead to conflict.

     

     

    This conflict can manifest internally or in the real world. A perfect example of it causing conflict in the real world is these 2 groups of people right now, who want to force their ideas onto Society. They both want to take money from you. They both want to make criminals out of innocent people. They both want to expand the empire. They both want to put a man in power to achieve their goals. Yet, they get violent around each other because they don’t see that they are the same. Of course, I’m talking about Bernie and Trump supporters.

     

    I’m not just picking on them. All candidates would continue the Status Quo with only slight changes in the style in which they achieve a larger state. If you say that you stand for freedom and don’t see the hypocrisy of “supporting” government, there isn’t a whole lot more to say.

     

    I will leave you with this food for thought. If you support the State and believe in the Constitution and the Declaration of Independence then ruminate on this.

     

    “When in the Course of human events it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.

     

    We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. — That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed…”

     

    Over a long enough timeline it become necessary to dissolve political connections to a government because all men are equal, therefore, no one is fit to rule. The power of government comes from the consent of the governed. 47% of eligible voters no longer consent. We are slowly pulling our consent and according to the Constitution and Democracy, We’ll have the right to be left alone and free of government because soon, we’ll out number you.

     

    But, that’s not what you meant when you said you support the Constitution and Democracy is it?

     

    Hypocrite.

     

    {extravote 1}

     

  • Who is #MyFriendAdam Kokesh?

    Who is Adam Kokesh? How do you define a person? By their actions and the results of their actions. Video and writing done by Robert Wasmund, voice over by Tripp Pugh. #MyfriendAdam